Flip operator's equality to Double Fourier

  • Thread starter Thread starter valjok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that applying the Fourier transform twice does not result in a simple vector flip as previously suggested. Specifically, for a 2x2 Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), the operation yields the identity matrix rather than flipping the vector elements. The confusion arises from misinterpretation of periodic functions, particularly when n = 2, where periodicity ensures that x(-t) equals x(t) for specific values. Thus, the assertion that F2[x(t)] = x(-t) is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform principles
  • Familiarity with Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) concepts
  • Knowledge of periodic functions and their properties
  • Basic linear algebra, particularly matrix operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) in detail
  • Learn about periodic functions and their implications in Fourier analysis
  • Explore the mathematical proof of the identity matrix in DFT operations
  • Investigate the implications of Fourier transforms in signal processing applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, signal processing engineers, and students studying Fourier analysis who seek to deepen their understanding of DFT and its properties.

valjok
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Some authors say that applying Fourier transform twice flips the vector, F2[x(t)] = x(-t). Yet, the simple checks proves this wrong. For instance, take 2x2 DFT:

\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;1\\ 1&amp;-1\end{array}\right]^2 = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\ 0&amp;1\end{array}\right]<br />

The Identity is different from counter-identity. It cannot therefore flip the vector elements. Where is the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the size-n DFT, (F2x)(t) = x(-t), where x is a periodic function with period n.

In the case n = 2, there is no mystery, since x(-0) = x(0) and x(-1) = x(-1 + 2) = x(1), since x has period 2.
 
This is a great answer!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K