Fluid mechanics - Water flowing through a pipe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of mass flow rate in fluid mechanics, specifically addressing the flawed approach of averaging velocity over the radius instead of the cross-sectional area of the pipe. The correct formula, mass flow rate = ρ * u_avg * A, requires that u_avg be calculated over the entire cross-section, not just a radial average. The participant's incorrect calculation yielded an average velocity of 1.528 m/s, which did not match the expected results due to this misunderstanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass flow rate in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of velocity profiles in pipes
  • Knowledge of integrals and their application in calculating averages
  • Basic principles of fluid mechanics, including density (ρ) and cross-sectional area (A)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the mass flow rate equation in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about velocity profiles in circular pipes and how they affect flow rates
  • Explore the application of double integrals in fluid dynamics for area calculations
  • Investigate the impact of varying velocity across different sections of a pipe
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in fluid mechanics, as well as anyone involved in the design and analysis of piping systems.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


JOOi9xN.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I am interested in why my method is flawed:
ufZsUTx.jpg


Alright I know how to do this problem. Essentially you solve mass flow rate = rho * double integral of u dA. HOWEVER, I decided to do this differently. I know that I can solve for the average u from the equation mass flow rate = rho * u_avg * A. I also know that the average u is just the integral of u over the integral of 1. I tried this and I get 1.528 m/s which is clearly not one of the answers. Why does my method not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the expression: ##\dot{m} = \rho u_{avg}A##,
##u_{avg}## needs to be the average over the cross-sectional area of the pipe, not the average over the radius.
 
TSny said:
In the expression: ##\dot{m} = \rho u_{avg}A##,
##u_{avg}## needs to be the average over the cross-sectional area of the pipe, not the average over the radius.

Hmmm, according to the equation doesn't u only depend on r? In other words u is constant for some circular ring r = k?
 
Consider two intervals of radius, one near the center of the pipe and one out at the edge. Suppose the interval dr is the same for both. There are more patches of area in the same interval dr out near the edge. So, the value of the velocity out at the edge contributes more to the average over the cross–section than the value near the center.
 

Attachments

  • pipe areas.jpg
    pipe areas.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 571

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K