Electric Flux through a Spherical Surface at the Origin

Click For Summary
To calculate the total electric flux through a spherical surface centered at the origin due to two point charges, one must apply Gauss's law, which states that the flux is equal to the charge enclosed divided by the permittivity of free space. The point charges are located outside the spherical surface, so the total enclosed charge is zero, resulting in zero electric flux. The discussion highlights the initial confusion regarding the need for integration and the correct application of Gauss's law. The value of the permittivity of free space was clarified as 8.854E-12. Ultimately, the conclusion is that since no charge is enclosed within the surface, the total electric flux is zero.
Black Armadillo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q_1 = 3.45 nC is located on the x-axis at x = 1.90 m, and a second point charge q_2 = -6.95 nC is on the y-axis at y = 1.20 m.

What is the total electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r_2 = 1.65 m?


Homework Equations


\Phi=\oint E_\bot dA
A=4\pi r^2
E=\frac{kq}{r^2}


The Attempt at a Solution


I started with:
\Phi=\oint \frac{kq}{r^2} dA
\Phi=A \oint \frac{kq}{r^2} dy
\Phi=4\pi r^2 \oint \frac{kq}{r^2} dy

To get r I did:
x^2+y^2=r^2
x^2+y^2=1.65^2
x=\sqrt{1.65^2-y^2}

r=\sqrt{(\sqrt{1.65^2-y^2})^2+(y-1.20)^2}

So:
\Phi=4\pi r^2 \oint \frac{kq}{1.65^2-y^2+(y-1.20)^2} dy

Evaluating this integral from -1.65 to 1.65 gives -1992.28 Nm^2/C

I'm pretty sure I'm setting up this integral completely wrong. Any help on how to do it correctly would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advanced for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why mess around with integrals? Use Gauss's law.
 
remember that the flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed divided by epsilon_not. aka gauss's law
 
By use Gauss's law do you mean \Phi=\frac{q}{\epsilon_0}? If so don't I need to know that permittivity of free space (\epsilon_0), which isn't given in the problem?
 
Alright I found that epsilon_0 = 8.854E-12. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K