Flux through a ring due to two charges

palaphys
Messages
253
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
two charges +q and -q are placed on the axis of a ring at a distance 16cm and 9cm from the center on opposite sides. the ring has a charge 2q uniformly distributed on it. find the flux through the ring.
Relevant Equations
solid angle, gauss law
1760968321833.webp

here is a simple diagram representing this situation. The issue I'm facing with this problem is a matter of sign convention.

We can write the flux through the ring as the sum of the contribution of fluxes due to the point charges individually.
So $$\Phi_{\text{net}} = \Phi_{+q} + \Phi_{-q} $$
additionally I was able to calculate the magnitudes of both of the individual fluxes as
## \left| \Phi_{+q} \right| = \frac{q}{10 \epsilon_0} ##
and
## \left| \Phi_{-q} \right| = 2\frac{q}{10 \epsilon_0} ##

both using a basic approach with solid angles(relating half angle to solid angle).but to get the net flux, should I add both the fluxes, or subtract them?

edit- radius of the ring is given as 12cm
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. A few thoughts…

palaphys said:
Homework Statement: two charges +q and -q are placed on the axis of a ring at a distance 16cm and 9cm from the center on opposite sides. the ring has a charge 2q uniformly distributed on it. find the flux through the ring.
You haven’t given the radius of the ring.

palaphys said:
We can write the flux through the ring as the sum of the contribution of fluxes due to the point charges individually.
So $$\Phi_{\text{net}} = \Phi_{+q} + \Phi_{-q} $$
You haven’t mentioned how you have dealt with the charge of 2q on the ring.

palaphys said:
additionally I was able to calculate the magnitudes of both of the individual fluxes as
## \left| \Phi_{+q} \right| = \frac{q}{10 \epsilon_0} ##
and
## \left| \Phi_{-q} \right| = 2\frac{q}{10 \epsilon_0} ##
There's no way for us to check these without the radius of the ring.

palaphys said:
to get the net flux, should I add both the fluxes, or subtract them?
What do you think? Hint: how would you find the individual and total fluxes through a surface enclosing charges of +q and -q?
 
Steve4Physics said:
Hi. A few thoughts…


You haven’t given the radius of the ring.


You haven’t mentioned how you have dealt with the charge of 2q on the ring.


There's no way for us to check these without the radius of the ring.


What do you think? Hint: how would you find the individual and total fluxes through a surface enclosing charges of +q and -q?
sorry radius of ring is given as 12cm.
also for the flux calculation through the ring I ignored the charge on the ring, As I am unsure how to deal with self flux (if that exists) in electrostatics, and I am kind of confident that this question does not involve those complexities.(given its level)

As for the hint, I would think about the relative positioning of the E vector and A vector, and check for the sign of the dot product, but I am unable to do so.
 
palaphys said:
radius of ring is given as 12cm.
Then I confirm your results.
palaphys said:
should I add both the fluxes, or subtract them?
What would the net flux be if they were both +q and equidistant on opposite sides?
(Consider symmetry.)
palaphys said:
also for the flux calculation through the ring I ignored the charge on the ring,
Consider one point charge on the ring. What flux does it generate through the ring (and not in the plane of the ring)?
 
palaphys said:
sorry radius of ring is given as 12cm.
In that case I agree with your values for the magnitudes of the fluxes. Though I would write '2/10' as '1/5'!

palaphys said:
also for the flux calculation through the ring I ignored the charge on the ring, As I am unsure how to deal with self flux (if that exists) in electrostatics, and I am kind of confident that this question does not involve those complexities.(given its level)
Imagine lines of flux as lines leaving a positive charge or entering a negative charge (image from https://eee.poriyaan.in/topic/electric-flux-11760/):
1760988611796.webp

If lines of flux pass through an area. that means they enter from one side of the area and leave from the other side of the area (image from https://artpictures.club/autumn-2023.html):
1760989478531.webp

You need to imagine a ring made of lots of individual charges. Visualise the lines of flux from any single charge on the ring. Convince yourself that none of the lines of flux actually pass through area enclosed by the ring. So the flux from a ring of charge, through the area enclosed by the ring, is zero.

palaphys said:
As for the hint, I would think about the relative positioning of the E vector and A vector, and check for the sign of the dot product, but I am unable to do so.
You are overcomplicating. Assuming you understand Gauss's law, try these questions:
Q1. A surface encloses a charge +q. What is the flux though the surface? (use Gauss's law).
Q2. A surface encloses a charge -q. What is the flux through the
surface? (use Gauss's law).
Q3. A surface encloses a charge +q and a charge -q:
a) What is the total charge enclosed?
b) What is the flux through the surface? (use Gauss's law).

Edit. Aha. @haruspex beat me too it.
 
We're dealing with an open surface and we should choose the normal vector (I know I'm a bit pedantic).
 
haruspex said:
What would the net flux be if they were both +q and equidistant on opposite sides?
(Consider symmetry.)
Intuition says zero.. flux due to one would "cancel out" the one due to the other
 
Gordianus said:
We're dealing with an open surface and we should choose the normal vector (I know I'm a bit pedantic).
yes I wanted to do this
 
Steve4Physics said:
You are overcomplicating. Assuming you understand Gauss's law, try these questions:
Q1. A surface encloses a charge +q. What is the flux though the surface? (use Gauss's law).
Q2. A surface encloses a charge -q. What is the flux through the
surface? (use Gauss's law).
Q3. A surface encloses a charge +q and a charge -q:
a) What is the total charge enclosed?
b) What is the flux through the surface? (use Gauss's law).
1.##\frac{q}{\epsilon_0}##
2. ##\frac{-q}{\epsilon_0}##
3a)0 b)0
 
Back
Top