1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Follow up on the 2 spheres capacitor problem. Help needed before tomorrow

  1. Mar 12, 2006 #1
    Follow up on the 2 spheres capacitor problem. Help needed before tomorrow!!!

    It was probably a bit hard to see what the old topic was about, so I started a new one. I'm still not quite sure on this problem, so I'd REALLY appreciate it if somebody could clear things up a little bit more. The problem is the following one:

    Two isolated conducting spheres of equal radius have charges +Q (#1)and -Q (#2) respectively. If they are separated by a large distance compared to their radius, what is the capacitance of this unusual capacitor?

    I've drawn this picture:

    http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/7725/naamloos6ha.gif [Broken]

    The origin is in the center of the left sphere.

    This is what I've found till now:

    [tex]C= \frac{Q}{V}[/tex]
    In this case Q= Q = the absolute charge on every sphere.
    V= the potential difference between #1 and #2, given by [tex]V= - \int_{#1}^{#2} E dl = = \int_{#2}^{#1} E dl[/tex]
    with dl= dxi +dyj+dzk

    The electric field due both spheres is determined by Coulombs law ([tex] E= \frac{kQ}{r^2}[/tex]).
    Pick a point at a distance r from the origin somewhere on the drawn x-axis. In that point the E field of #1 and #2 is felt in the positive x direction (#1 is positive, so the field lines take off from #1 and #2 is negative, so the field lines approach #2). Therefore the magnitudes of the electric fields of #1 and #2 add and the resultant E is in the positive x direction.

    The distance from the point P to the center of #1 (in the origin)= r.
    Therefore [tex] E_1= \frac{kQ}{r^2}[/tex]
    The distance from the point P to the center of #2 = [L+2R]-r.
    Therefore [tex] E_2= \frac{kQ}{([L+2R]-r)^2}[/tex]
    And [tex] E total= \frac{kQ}{r^2} + \frac{kQ}{([L+2R]-r)^2}[/tex]

    Now substitute this in the integral [tex]V= \int_{#2}^{#1} E dl [/tex] with values of:

    [tex] E= E total= \frac{kQ}{r^2} + \frac{kQ}{([L+2R]-r)^2}[/tex]
    dl= dr, with dr the projection of dl in radial direction and
    #1= R
    #2= L+R

    (that is the domain of the space between the two spheres where the point P can be chosen in)

    This gives:

    [tex]V= \int_{L+R}^{R} \frac{kQ}{r^2} + \frac{kQ}{([L+2R]-r)^2} dr = \left[ - \frac{kQ}{r} + \frac{kQ}{([L+2R]-r)}\right]_{L+R}^{R} =
    ( - \frac{kQ}{R} + \frac{kQ}{(L+R)}) - (-\frac{kQ}{L+R} + \frac{kQ}{(R)}) =[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{2kQ}{L+R} - \frac{2kQ}{R}= \frac{2kQR-2kQ(L+R)}{R (L+R)}= \frac{2kQR-2kQL -2kQR)}{R (L+R)}= \frac{-2kQL}{R (L+R)}[/tex]

    Substituting this into the formula of [tex]C= \frac{Q}{V}[/tex] provides:

    [tex]C= \frac{Q}{ \frac{-2kQL}{R (L+R)}}= \frac{Q R (L+R)}{-2kQ}= \frac{R (L+R)}{-2k}[/tex]

    But given is R<<L, so R= 0 which gives me a C of 0, which can't be possible!!! So what have I done wrong?!
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 12, 2006 #2
    Is a Taylor Expansion a good possibility?

    If so this gives me:

    [tex]C= \frac{-R}{2k} - \frac{-R^2}{kL} [/tex]

    Is this the right way? & Have I obtained the correct answer? & How do I know if 2 terms of the expansion are enough: do I need to use only 1?
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2006
  4. Mar 12, 2006 #3
    Or maybe I shouldn't let R go to zero? Then again: a negative capacitance is pretty odd....
  5. Mar 12, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    you found a negative capacitance from your negative Potential Difference.
    Your Potential Difference was negative because you integrated
    FROM large x-values TO small x-values, instead of along the E-field.
    No big deal.

    The 2kQ/R was expected ... but the Potential at the +Q was decreased
    as the -Q moved in , from infinity far away to only (L+R) away.
    The Potential at the -Q sphere went up as +Q came in from infinity to L+R

    L >> R means that you can neglect R/L relative to 1 ... L+R = L(1 + R/L) ~ L .

    careful with your bookkeeping, I think you lost an L at the end.
    dV = 2kQ/R - 2kQ/L => C = R/2k + R^2/2kL
  6. Mar 13, 2006 #5
    So the Taylor expansion is a good idea?
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2006
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook