be no more than c? In fact, only for the first triple does equality hold. Upon examining some of the triples, I noticed this must be true. However, I'm having a hard time explaining why. Is there a good explanation for this? Many thanks!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# For any Pythagorean triple, the number of primes under a + b + c must

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: For any Pythagorean triple, the number of primes under a + b + c must

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**