For n1 = 2.15 and n2 = 1.26, what is the critical angle so that all of

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the critical angle for light transitioning between two media with refractive indices n1 = 2.15 and n2 = 1.26, as well as rearranging an equation involving maximum number of modes (Nmax) in a waveguide context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Snell's law and the formula for critical angle, with some confusion regarding the correct application of refractive indices. Others express difficulty in rearranging equations to isolate variables, particularly n2, and question the steps leading to mathematical errors.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the critical angle calculation and the rearrangement of the equation for Nmax. Some participants have provided guidance on isolating terms and suggested methods for rearranging equations, but confusion remains regarding the mathematical processes involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can receive. There is a noted struggle with mathematical manipulation and understanding of the underlying principles.

Sloan650
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
For n1 = 2.15 and n2 = 1.26, what is the critical angle so that all of the incident light, from medium 1 to medium 2 is reflected?



Im using Sin ic = n1/n2



For Sin ic i get =1.706

But the reverse Sin of that comes up math error?

HELP
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Sloan650 said:
Im using Sin ic = n1/n2
You're mixing up n1 and n2. Start from Snell's law and derive the expression for total internal reflection.
 


Thank you!

I need help rearranging the equation too, I am finding it impossible!

Nmax = 4a/lamda x sqaureroot (N1^2 - N2^2)

I need to find n2
 


Firstly you gave this equation:

Nmax = 4a/lamda x sqaureroot (N1^2 - N2^2)

Am I correct to think this is equivalent?

N_{max}=\frac{4a}{λ} \sqrt{n_{1}^{2}-n_{2}^{2}}

(I would suggest in future as opposed to using "x" to indicate multiplies, I would use "*". Simply for clarity)

If this is the case begin by squaring both sides of the equation, and then attempt to isolate the n_{2} term.
 


I have no idea how to rearrange this.

i know by squaring both sides the sqaure root will disappear. But on the other side Nmax = 1.

How does it rearrange so i get a positive number to square root to find n2?
 


Sloan650 said:
i know by squaring both sides the sqaure root will disappear. But on the other side Nmax = 1.
So?
How does it rearrange so i get a positive number to square root to find n2?
Start by squaring both sides and then go from there.
 


Find an equation for n2, and then try to understand what this means.
 


Im so confused :(

every time i try to rearrange to find n2 i get math error!
 


Sloan650 said:
every time i try to rearrange to find n2 i get math error!
Show what you did symbolically, step by step.
 
  • #10


This is due to you doing it on a calculator. Rearrange it on paper, so that you have

n2= ...
 
  • #11
Do I have to multiply out the brackets?
 
  • #12


The term \sqrt{n_{1}^{2}-n_{2}^{2}}=\sqrt{(n_{1}^{2}-n_{2}^{2})}

So by squaring you will get

N_{max}^{2}=(\frac{4a}{λ})^{2} (n_{1}^{2}-n_{2}^{2})

It would be more convenient if you multiplied both sides of (\frac{λ}{4a})^{2} rather than multiplying out the brackets.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K