For sets A,B, if I can that show |A|=|B| and A is a subset of B, then A=B?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmjlt88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of sets, specifically regarding cardinality and subset relationships. The original poster questions whether having two sets of equal cardinality, with one set being a subset of the other, is sufficient to conclude that the sets are equal.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of cardinality and subset relationships, with one suggesting a counterexample involving the natural numbers and integers. Others clarify that the sets in question are finite, which shifts the context of the discussion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in reasoning about the properties of finite sets. Some express confidence in the conclusion that the original poster is seeking, while others acknowledge the complexity of proving such properties.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the sets being finite, which is a critical constraint in the discussion. Additionally, there are references to group theory and cyclic groups, indicating a broader mathematical context that may influence the reasoning.

jmjlt88
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
[Note: If this is posted in the wrong forum, I'm very sorry. It is directly related to a textbook question.]

This may be a silly question.

I know that I can prove two sets to be equal by showing that they are subsets of each other. But, what if I have that two sets have the same cardinality and that one set is a subset of the other. Is this enough to show that the sets are indeed equal?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about [itex]A=\mathbb{N}[/itex] and [itex]B=\mathbb{Z}[/itex].
 
You're right! :)

But, I forgot to mention that they are finite. :(
 
OK, then it is indeed true. Do you need to prove this?? It's pretty obvious, but the proof might be quite complicated.
 
Suppose a ε <b>. Then <a> = <b> iff a and b have the same order.

Proof [just the converse] :
Let G be a group. Let a,b be elements of G. Suppose a ε <b> and suppose a and b have the same order. Let n=ord(a)=ord(b). Then, the cyclic groups generated by a and b have the same order. That is, n=|<a>|=|<b>|. Now, from our assumption, a ε <b> and, then, since <b> consists of all powers of b, a = bk for some integer k. Hence, <a>=<bk>, which is a subset of <b>. Then since <a> is a subset of <b> and they have the same cardinality, they must be equal. Hence, <a>=<b>, our desired result. QED
 
jmjlt88 said:
Suppose a ε <b>. Then <a> = <b> iff a and b have the same order.

Proof [just the converse] :
Let G be a group. Let a,b be elements of G. Suppose a ε <b> and suppose a and b have the same order. Let n=ord(a)=ord(b). Then, the cyclic groups generated by a and b have the same order. That is, n=|<a>|=|<b>|. Now, from our assumption, a ε <b> and, then, since <b> consists of all powers of b, a = bk for some integer k. Hence, <a>=<bk>, which is a subset of <b>. Then since <a> is a subset of <b> and they have the same cardinality, they must be equal. Hence, <a>=<b>, our desired result. QED

Yeah, that seems like a perfectly valid proof!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K