Proving Convergence of $(-1)^n/\sqrt{n+2}$ Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter frasifrasi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series $(-1)^n/\sqrt{n+2}$ and the conditions for convergence of the series $n(1+n^2)^p$. Participants explore the concept of conditional convergence and the implications of absolute convergence, as well as the application of various convergence tests.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of conditional convergence and the criteria for applying the alternating series test. Questions arise regarding the implications of the absolute divergence of the series and the conditions under which the second series converges.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of conditional convergence and exploring different tests for convergence. Some participants express confusion about the application of tests and the manipulation of series, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention attempts to use the integral test and the ratio test, as well as confusion regarding the manipulation of terms in the series. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problems presented and the need for further clarification on certain mathematical operations.

frasifrasi
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
(-1)^n/sqrt(n+2) , How do I show that it is conditionally convergent?

The absolute value of the series, 1/n^(1/2) diverges, so shouldn't the series diverge?


--Also, I have never encountered a problem like this, so here is another question:

n(1+n^2)^p , for which values of p does the series converge?
I tried the integral telst by letting u = 1 + n^2, but could not get the answer...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
frasifrasi said:
(-1)^n/sqrt(n+2) , How do I show that it is conditionally convergent?

The absolute value of the series, 1/n^(1/2) diverges, so shouldn't the series diverge?
Do you understand what "conditionally convergent" means? By showing that The series with absolute values diverges you have shown that the series is NOT "absolutely convergent". But a series with alternating sign is a whole different matter: use the "alternating series test": if a series is of the form (-1)nan and {an} is a decreasing sequence, then the series converges. A series that converges but does NOT converge absolutely is called "conditionally convergent".


--Also, I have never encountered a problem like this, so here is another question:

n(1+n^2)^p , for which values of p does the series converge?
I tried the integral telst by letting u = 1 + n^2, but could not get the answer...
??Do you mean a fraction with that in the denominator? If so then go ahead and multiply it out: you get a polynomial with leading term n2p+ 1. It's not too difficult to show that no matter what the other terms are, eventually that fraction is smaller than 2/n2p+1 and that converges, absolutely for 2p+1> 1 or p> 0.
If you actually do mean the series n(1+ n2)p then it obviously does not converge for p> 0. If p is negative, it can be written in the form n/(1+ n2)-p. Now the denominator will have leading coefficient n2p and, dividing both numerator and denominator by n, is of the form 1/(n2p-1+ ...). That is clearly larger than 2/n2p-1 and so converges absolutely for 2p-1> 1 or p> 2.
 
The answer should be p < -1...
That is the series given (n(1+ n^2)^p ), there is no fractions involved.Thank you for the clarification on the first question, now the only thing I still don't get is how to do the second question. I tried using the ratio test, but it didn't get anywhere.
 
Sorry, I had my signs wrong! n/(1+n^2)-p is, when you multiply that out, the same as n/(n(-2p+ other terms) which is the same as 1/(n-2p-1+ other terms). You can "compare" that to 1/n-2p-1 which, by the "p test" converges absolutely for -2p-1> 1 or -2p< 2 or p< -1.
 
Thanks, but when I multiply what out?
 
(1+ x^2)^{-p}, of course! (Remembering that, in this case, -p is positive.)
 
How do I multiply that out? I appreciate your patience but it is just not clear to me...
 
How would you multiply (1+ x^2)^2? (1+ x^2)?

Notice that the only thing you need to now its the leading term- the one with highest exponent.
 
for that multiplication, (1+ x^2)^2, shouldn't the highest exponent be x^4, why do you get n^(-2p-1) for the series, where does the -1 come from?

Oh, I see you divided it by n, so it fits the form 1/n...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
You flipped the > sign too early in post 4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K