For this scalene triangle: which of the following is true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a problem involving a scalene triangle, specifically determining the validity of various statements regarding its properties. The correct answer is identified as option D, which relates to the relationships defined in the Metric relationships summary.pdf. The participants analyze the conditions under which each statement could be true, emphasizing the significance of angle bisectors and the properties of similar triangles. The conversation highlights the importance of visualizing the triangle and its angles to understand the relationships between the sides.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scalene triangles and their properties
  • Familiarity with angle bisectors and their implications
  • Knowledge of the Metric relationships in geometry
  • Ability to interpret geometric diagrams and relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of scalene triangles and their angle relationships
  • Learn about angle bisectors and their effects on triangle similarity
  • Review the Metric relationships summary for geometric equations
  • Practice drawing and measuring scalene triangles to visualize relationships
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, educators teaching triangle properties, and anyone preparing for geometry-related examinations or homework assignments.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


The problem is attached as TheProblem.jpg and the answer is D.

Homework Equations


Perhaps the equations attached in Metric relationships summary.pdf.

The Attempt at a Solution


My logic is as follows:
For A, XW does not necessarily equal WZ.

For B, it seems that they are trying to trick the student into thinking of h^2 = d*e (from the Metric relationships summary.pdf file).

For C, the ratio does not work out because the angle facing each respective smaller/larger leg is different.

For D, I can't figure it out but it seems to relate to the Metric relationships summary.pdf file I attached.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Metric relationships summary.jpg
    Metric relationships summary.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 592
  • TheProblem.jpg
    TheProblem.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 580
Physics news on Phys.org
The metric summary table does not quite apply here because the line YW is not perpendicular to XZ.

What it shows you is that the angle at Y has been bisected - so that ∠XYW = ∠WYZ.
The question wants to know if you understand what this does to the relationships.

One way of thinking this through is to figure wat it would take for each condition to be true: what does it mean?

For instance, A is true if the two sub-triangles are similar (since they share a side, this means the overall triangle XYZ must be isosceles.)

Of course, another approach is to physically (and carefully) draw a few (large) scalene triangles, bisect one angle, and then measure the corresponding sides :)
 
Thanks!

Thanks to you telling me to focus on the bisected angle, I basically converted the answer D into words to make sense of it:

(small leg of small triangle)/(hypotenuse of small triangle) = (small leg of large triangle)/(hypotenuse of large triangle).

The "hypotenuse of small triangle" part is technically not the hypotenuse of the small triangle but rather a length that is equivalently large as it.
 
Great, well done.
Putting it in words is a pain - personally I relabel these things with lower case for side lengths and upper case for the corresponding angles.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K