Force Acting on Rope: Homework Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter intdx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Rope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving forces acting on a picture hanging by two ropes. The original poster questions the equality of forces on the ropes and the calculation of the force acting on one of the ropes, given the weight of the picture.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the calculation of forces acting on the ropes, questioning the reasoning behind the accepted answer of 49N. They explore the combination of gravitational force with horizontal components and express confusion about the relationship between these forces.
  • Some participants suggest resolving the gravitational force into components acting on the ropes, while others propose using Lami's theorem or checking for equilibrium.
  • There is a discussion about the angles involved and how they relate to the forces acting on the ropes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and offering various approaches. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some guidance has been provided regarding the use of force resolution and equilibrium concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an indication that the original poster is uncertain about the underlying principles of the problem.

intdx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/index.html (#6b, 6c)
A 10 kg picture is hanging on a wall by two ropes.
http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/ch5/IMG00008.GIF
...
b. Are the forces acting on the ropes A and B equal in magnitude?
c. How big is the force acting on the rope A?

The site accepts the answer 49N for #6c, but I'm not sure why.

Homework Equations


[tex]F_g=mg[/tex]
[tex]F=\sqrt{F_x^2+F_y^2}[/tex]
[tex]F_x=F\times \cos \theta[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer for #6c appears to be equal to
[tex]10\textrm{kg}\times 9.80\textrm{m/s}^2\times \textrm{cos }60^\circ=49\textrm{N,}[/tex]
but that doesn't make sense to me; shouldn't we combine the weight of the picture with the rightward pull? In that case, how do we find the rightward pull?

Or, is there an imaginary diagonal force--equal in magnitude to the gravitational force--of which we want the horizontal component? In that case, why?

The answer to #6b is "No," but I'm not sure why. (I'm guessing that once I understand #6c, then #6b will follow.)

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I suppose that combining the force of gravity in this case (98N) with a horizontal vector couldn't reduce the magnitude to just 49N...
Is it the second option that I proposed, then? [tex]\sqrt{F_g^2\ \textrm{cos}^2\theta +F_g^2\ \textrm{cos}^2(90^\circ-\theta)}=F_g\textrm{,}[/tex] so it seems plausible. The forces on the ropes, not including from the wall or ceiling where they're above, should add up to the force exerted by the picture, right?

Still, even if I've found the way to do the problem, I don't feel like I have a sufficient understanding of it.
 
You can resolve mg to 2 components of opposing direction to A and B since they are 90° apart.
To me it is mgCos30°.
 
azizlwl said:
You can resolve mg to 2 components of opposing direction to A and B since they are 90° apart.
To me it is mgCos30°.
I'm sorry; I don't understand what you mean. Would you mind drawing it?

Would it be something like this?
34j3y9k.png

[tex]mg\textrm{cos(30}^\circ \textrm{)}[/tex]

EDIT - whoops, sorry, I edited without realizing you had posted again.
 
Last edited:
intdx said:
I'm sorry; I don't understand what you mean. Would you mind drawing it?

Just extend line A and B downward. These 2 directions can be components of mg.
 
Hello intdx,
Try Lami's theorem here.Or otherwise resolve the weight along OA and OB to check for equilibrium.
regards
Yukoel
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K