B Force Exerted on a Conductor by a Homogeneous Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
A conductor in a homogeneous magnetic field experiences motion due to the Lorentz force, which acts uniformly on both sides of the conductor. The discussion questions the textbook's explanation that suggests a difference in magnetic field strength creates the force, arguing that this interpretation is misleading. Instead, the Lorentz force, determined by the right-hand rule, should be the primary factor in the conductor's movement. The idea of magnetic field lines and their density is presented as a secondary interpretation of the Lorentz force. Ultimately, the motion of the conductor is fundamentally due to the Lorentz force rather than a differential in magnetic field strength.
Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
1720116266222.png

In my book it's said that a conductor in a homogeneous magnetic field moves because there is a stronger magnetic field on one side and a weaker magnetic field on the other. Now that seems wrong to me. I mean, if we were to look at the Lorentz force that the magnetic field exerts on the conductor, it should point in the same direction anyway (right hand rule; both sides). The way they say it, it's like "because of the difference in magnetic field/induction we get a force". So, is it because of the Lorentz force or the difference in magnetic field?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the textbook shows an interpretation of Lorentz force by magnetic field lines, i.e. vortex made by current around the wire should pushed away from dense to less dense side.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top