Force in Center of Mass frame equaling zero

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of two particles in free fall, specifically analyzing the forces and momentum in the center of mass (CM) frame. The original poster presents a contradiction regarding the total force in the CM frame, asserting that it should equal zero, while also noting that the sum of the gravitational forces does not yield zero.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of external forces on the momentum in the CM frame and question the validity of applying Newton's second law in an accelerating frame. There is a focus on understanding the role of fictitious forces and the conditions under which momentum in the CM frame remains zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the application of Newton's laws in non-inertial frames and the nature of fictitious forces. There is recognition of the original poster's assertion about momentum in the CM frame, but also a critical examination of the assumptions made regarding forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the CM frame is accelerating due to gravity, which complicates the application of standard dynamics principles. The discussion highlights the need to consider fictitious forces when analyzing systems in non-inertial frames.

CGandC
Messages
326
Reaction score
34

Homework Statement



Suppose I have particles with masses m1 and m2 , both are in freefall:
upload_2017-9-26_21-30-7.png

Then , looking at the center of mass coordinates , I know that the sum of momentums of masses m1 and m2 in the center of mass coordinates is equal to zero : P1c + P2c = 0

so now I know that the total force acting on the masses in the center of mass frame is :
Fcmf = d(P1c + P2c )/dt = 0

From here I get : Fcmf = 0

But , If I sum the forces ( only weights ) of the two bodies, I don't get zero : Fcmf= -M2g -M1g ≠ 0
(I get contradiction , because I know as a fact that Fcmf must be equal to zero , Fcmf = 0 )
Why do I get a contradiction?

Homework Equations


F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CGandC said:
P1c + P2c = 0
This is true only if the CM does not accelerate, i.e. if there are no external forces acting on it. Here there is gravity.
 
kuruman said:
This is true only if the CM does not accelerate, i.e. if there are no external forces acting on it. Here there is gravity.

so what will be the sum of momentums P1c + P2c if there are external forces acting on the system? I always get that P1c + P2c = 0 , regardless of whether there are external forces acting on the system or not.
 
kuruman said:
This is true only if the CM does not accelerate, i.e. if there are no external forces acting on it. Here there is gravity.

This isn't correct .

OP is right that the net momentum of the two masses in CM frame is zero .

Total momentum of the system is always zero in CM frame irrespective of whether CM is accelerating or not .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CGandC
CGandC said:
so what will be the sum of momentums P1c + P2c if there are external forces acting on the system? I always get that P1c + P2c = 0 , regardless of whether there are external forces acting on the system or not.

You are right :smile:

CGandC said:
the total force acting on the masses in the center of mass frame is :
Fcmf = d(P1c + P2c )/dt = 0

F = dP/dt is valid only in inertial (non accelerating) frames .

Since CM is accelerating , it is not an inertial frame .

You are right when you say that ΣP = 0 in CM frame . But you are wrong if you apply F=dP/dt in CM frame .

Note that F=dP/dt is nothing but Newton's 2nd Law which is valid only in inertial frames .

Hope that helps .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CGandC
conscience said:
This isn't correct .
You are correct. I meant to say what you said much more eloquently in post #5.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: conscience
conscience said:
You are right :smile:
F = dP/dt is valid only in inertial (non accelerating) frames .

Since CM is accelerating , it is not an inertial frame .

You are right when you say that ΣP = 0 in CM frame . But you are wrong if you apply F=dP/dt in CM frame .

Note that F=dP/dt is nothing but Newton's 2nd Law which is valid only in inertial frames .

Hope that helps .
Just to make sure,
If I were to use Newton's second law for the CM accelerating frame , I'd have to fix it like this ( written below ) ? :
F+Ffict=dP/dt , where Ffict is a pseudo-force / fictional force
and This pseudo force is equal to : Ffict = +M1g +M2g , so that F+Fict = 0 , Is this correct?
 
CGandC said:
Just to make sure,
If I were to use Newton's second law for the CM accelerating frame , I'd have to fix it like this ( written below ) ? :
F+Ffict=dP/dt , where Ffict is a pseudo-force / fictional force
and This pseudo force is equal to : Ffict = +M1g +M2g , so that F+Fict = 0 , Is this correct?

I am not sure if you are properly applying the fictitious force .

This is what is happening in your example .

Fictitious force acts on all the particles whose motion we are interested in as seen from the accelerated frame .

In your example , fictitious force acts on both ##M_1## and ##M_2## in the direction opposite to the acceleration of the frame (CM frame in your example) .

So , considering downward positive , as seen from the CM frame , fictitious force ##-M_1a_{cm}## acts on ##M_1## apart from ##M_1g## .Similarly fictitious force ##-M_2a_{cm}## acts on ##M_2## apart from ##M_2g## .

##a_{cm}=g##

The net force acting on ##M_1##and ##M_2## as seen from the CM frame = ##-M_1a_{cm} - M_2a_{cm} +M_1g+M_2g ## . This evaluates to 0 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CGandC

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K