Force of 6" x 18" Steel Panel Weighing 3.25 Pounds Striking a Person

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter expertplus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Steel Weighing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force exerted by a steel panel weighing 3.25 pounds that falls and strikes a person on the head. The scenario involves a specific height of fall and seeks to understand the dynamics of the impact, including the necessary equations and assumptions involved in the calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a concrete answer with equations for the force of impact from a falling steel panel.
  • Another participant notes that additional details are needed to accurately determine the force, suggesting that the impact could be modeled as an elastic collision, which requires knowledge of the collision's elasticity.
  • A different participant proposes a simplified approach using the work-energy theorem to estimate the speed of the panel just before impact, calculating it to be approximately 16 feet/second.
  • This participant also discusses the impulse imparted to the panel and the corresponding impulse on the person's head, estimating it to be 52 pound feet/second, and suggests that contact time could be used to calculate the force acting on the head.
  • Assumptions made include neglecting air resistance and estimating a contact time of 0.01 seconds, with a warning that variations in these assumptions could significantly affect the results.
  • Another participant mentions treating the panel as a point object with a mass of 3.25 pounds for the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that more details are necessary for accurate calculations, and multiple competing views on how to approach the problem remain. There is no consensus on the exact method or assumptions to use for determining the force of impact.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about air resistance, collision elasticity, and contact time, which could significantly influence the results. The discussion also highlights the complexity introduced by factors such as the angle of impact and the compression of hair.

expertplus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This topic has been discussed before at this site, but there was never any agreement. I have a very specific situation that I hope I can get a concrete answer, including equations and a step-by-step solution in inch/pounds/seconds units.

A steel flat panel 6" X 18" weighing 3.25 pounds pivoted and fell 4 feet (center of gravity) striking a person flat on the head. What was the force that struck the person? This was an actual situation that raised a lump on the person's head.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not read the thread you refer to, but I will most likely just repeat what has been said there.

You cannot in general say what this (maximum or average) force will be without knowing a bit more. If we ignore friction from air you could model the impact itself as a more or less elastic collision transferring momentum and energy from the plate to the head. To do this you would need to know how elastic the collision is, either by measurements or by a more detailed model of the plate bending dynamics. The latter would also enable you to get a rough estimate of the collision time and forces involved if force really is what you want.

What conclusion are you hoping to make based on knowing this force? Could you reach this conclusion in other ways?
 
Like filiplarsen has mentioned, you'll need more details for more accurate measurements...

but if you were to simplify the case,
by ignoring air resistance
you could calculate the speed of the plate just before it hit the head by the work-energy theorem.

it comes out to be approx 16 feet/second


and if you take the (plate+earth) as the system, you could calculate the impulse imparted to the plate by the mans head due to the collision. This impulse would be equal to the change in momentum of the plate.

momentum of the plate(just before hitting the man's head) = mass.velocity = 52 pound feet/second

momentum of plate(after hitting the man) = 0
{ assuming the plate comes to rest, the collision being completely inelastic }

so, impulse exerted = change in momentum = 52-0 = 52 pound feet/second

and by Newton's third law, since every action, has an equal and opposite reaction, the impulse acted on the plate, would be the same as the impulse on the mans head.

so impulse exerted on the mans head = 52 pound feet/second

and furthermore, if you can measure the time for which the head and the plate are in contact, you could calculate the force acting on the man's head by dividing the impulse by the contact time.

assuming, the plate was in contact with the man's head for 0.01 seconds,

then force acting on the man's head = impulse/contact time = 52/0.01 = 5200 pound feet/(second)^2

that's equivalent to a mass of about 162.5 pounds.


but this will vary from the real case, as all this is done assuming air resistance isn't present..
If you were to take that into consideration... Well, the problem would become much more complex.
And also, i randomly assumed the contact time to be 0.01 seconds
even a small difference in this can make quite a difference.

besides, loads of other factors will come into play, like the compression offered by the hair, angle of striking.. The actual elasticity of the collision etc etc..

(and I'm not familiar with the british system of units of force and momentum so i just stuck with the basics..)

and yes, sorry for the lack of proper equations, but i have no access to a pc as of now and am posting this from my cell phone..
Hope this helps.
Cheers.
 
Last edited:
And i forgot to mention,
i also made an assumption that the plate is a point object with a mass of 3.25 pounds..
I guess that about covers it..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K