I Force of gravity on JWST while orbiting L2

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between centrifugal force and gravitational force on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) while it orbits L2. When the JWST is at a point in its L2 orbit, the centrifugal force vector aligns with the sun-earth plane, but if displaced vertically, it still acts towards the plane. The gravitational force from the Earth and Sun always pulls the JWST towards the plane, regardless of its position. This results in a net force that draws the telescope back toward the orbital plane. The principles discussed apply universally, not just at Lagrange points.
Eugene
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Concerning the centrifugal force acting on James Webb telescope
When the Webb is at a point on its L2 orbit, (not at L2), what direction is the centrifugal force vector compared to the direction of the combined earth-sun gravity vector on the opposite side? Is the direction of this centrifugal vector ALWAYS parallel to the sun-earth plane? or is it always opposite (straght line connects the combined gravity and centrifugal)?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The Sun, Earth, and Lagrange points are all in the same plane, which is also the orbital plane. Therefore, the centrifugal force in the corotating frame also lies in this plane.
 
but if the scope is 500,000 kilometers north of this point(on the L2 orbit) it is no longer in the plane. What is the relationship of the gravity force to the centrifugal force then?
 
The centrifugal force will always be in the plane of rotation. Regardless of whether or not you displace the satellite from the plane itself. Any displacement up or below the plane will therefore give a resultant force that attracts the satellite towards the plane. This is true everywhere, not only at the Lagrange points.
 
Many thanks!
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
816
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K