Force of impact (ladder to head)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyrre Hovda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Head Impact
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the impact force of a ladder falling onto a person's head, exploring various factors that influence this force, including the materials involved and the dynamics of the impact. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, assumptions about movement during impact, and energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the ladder is falling onto the head, which influences the calculations.
  • There is discussion about how the rigidity of the ladder and the skull affects the impact force, with some suggesting that a foam coating could reduce the force.
  • Participants note that the movement of the head during impact is crucial for determining the force, with one stating that if the head doesn't move, the force could approach infinity.
  • One participant proposes calculating the force based on the kinetic energy of the ladder and the work done in stopping it, suggesting a relationship between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy.
  • Another participant challenges the concept of "force of impact," arguing that impacts are better understood in terms of momentum or energy rather than a single force value.
  • There are calculations presented for estimating force, including a formula that relates force to mass, height, and distance moved during impact.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the physical meaning of the calculations and the assumptions made in the process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on how to approach the calculation of impact force, with no consensus reached on a definitive method or interpretation of the results. Multiple competing views remain regarding the significance of different factors in the impact scenario.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the rigidity of materials, the movement of the head, and the nature of the impact force. The discussion also touches on the complexity of translating calculations into meaningful physical interpretations.

Kyrre Hovda
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone!

need to calculate the impact force done by the ladder to the head explained in the drawing. Can anyone help?

Kyrre
 

Attachments

  • 20171206_121307.jpg
    20171206_121307.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 560
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyrre Hovda said:
Hi everyone!

need to calculate the impact force done by the ladder to the head explained in the drawing. Can anyone help?

Kyrre

Are you talking about holding the ladder up using your head or letting the ladder fall onto your head?
 
Hi PeroK,

the ladder is falling onto the head
 
Kyrre Hovda said:
Hi PeroK,

the ladder is falling onto the head

The force depends on the rigidity of the ladder and your skull. If the ladder had a thick foam coating, then that would reduce the impact force. It also critically depends on how much you are able to move during the impact. If you stand rigidly then there will be a much higher force than if you bend your knees as the ladder strikes.
 
PeroK said:
The force depends on the rigidity of the ladder and your skull. If the ladder had a thick foam coating, then that would reduce the impact force. It also critically depends on how much you are able to move during the impact. If you stand rigidly then there will be a much higher force than if you bend your knees as the ladder strikes.

The ladder is made from aluminium. Assume the head doesn't move much during impact.
 
Kyrre Hovda said:
The ladder is made from aluminium. Assume the head doesn't move much during impact.

That data is just as important as the mass of the ladder or the height of the person. You would need to measure the movement of the head during the impact to determine the force. If the head doesn't move at all, then the force tends to an infinite force.
 
PeroK said:
That data is just as important as the mass of the ladder or the height of the person. You would need to measure the movement of the head during the impact to determine the force. If the head doesn't move at all, then the force tends to an infinite force.

Lets say the head moves 5 cm. How do you calculate the force?
 
Kyrre Hovda said:
Lets say the head moves 5 cm. How do you calculate the force?

I take it this isn't homework, but an accident investigation of sorts?

How much physics do you know? Do you know what angular momentum is?
 
Given the distance moved by the head and the [questionable] assumption that the force is constant over that distance, one can immediately come up with a rough estimate of the force involved. The strategy is to start by computing the kinetic energy of the ladder and then equate that to the work done in stopping the ladder.

The kinetic energy of the ladder can be determined most easily by equating its kinetic energy [rotational or otherwise] with its loss of potential energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kyrre Hovda and PeroK
  • #10
"Force of impact" isn't really a thing. You can fake some numbers and calculate a force, but it will seem really large while not being very meaningful.

Impacts are generally measured in momentum or energy: such as the energy required to break a metal bar...or bone. Try googling "fracture energy" and "charpy impact test".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kyrre Hovda
  • #11
PeroK said:
I take it this isn't homework, but an accident investigation of sorts?

How much physics do you know? Do you know what angular momentum is?

Yes, it was an accident. I have calculated the angular acceleration using the equation in the piqture. And the angular speed at 35 degrees.
 

Attachments

  • Formler.JPG
    Formler.JPG
    5.3 KB · Views: 584
Last edited:
  • #12
Thanks for all replies folks! And bear in mind i might be using some words at bit imprecisely, since I'm norwegian :P
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #13
Kyrre Hovda said:
Yes, it was an accident. I have calculated the angular speed using the equation in the piqture.

As suggested by @jbriggs444 above, there is a shortcut simply by considering energy. The force acting over the distance (e.g. ##d = 5cm##) must equal the kinetic energy lost by the ladder. And the kinetic energy of the ladder is equal to the gravitational potential energy lost.

Approximately, therefore, the force is given by ##F = \frac{mgh}{d}##, where ##h## can be calculated from the length and angle of the ladder:

##h = \frac{L}{2}(1 - \cos \theta)##

Although, quite what this calculation means in physical terms is not clear.

Note: if you assume that the angle you have is the final angle, then that takes care of any additional PE lost in the collision itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kyrre Hovda
  • #14
PeroK said:
As suggested by @jbriggs444 above, there is a shortcut simply by considering energy. The force acting over the distance (e.g. ##d = 5cm##) must equal the kinetic energy lost by the ladder. And the kinetic energy of the ladder is equal to the gravitational potential energy lost.

Approximately, therefore, the force is given by ##F = \frac{mgh}{d}##, where ##h## can be calculated from the length and angle of the ladder:

##h = \frac{L}{2}(1 - \cos \theta)##

Although, quite what this calculation means in physical terms is not clear.

Note: if you assume that the angle you have is the final angle, then that takes care of any additional PE lost in the collision itself.
I have calculated the kinetic energy. Again see the picture :P
 

Attachments

  • energy.JPG
    energy.JPG
    6.5 KB · Views: 592
  • #15
Kyrre Hovda said:
I have calculated the kinetic energy. Again see the picture :P

That was the hard way. In any case:

##Fd \approx \Delta KE##
 
  • #16
PeroK said:
##h = \frac{L}{2}(1 - \cos \theta)##

Although, quite what this calculation means in physical terms is not clear.
The first two terms in the series expansion of ##\cos \theta## yield ##1 - \frac{\theta^2}{2}##. This means that for "small" rotations, the 1's cancel and you have a kinetic energy scales as the square of the lean angle at impact.
 
  • #17
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
  • #18
Thread will remain closed. PF can not provide accident analysis to be used for legal purposes.

The OP is urged to hire a professional for accident analysis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K