Force on a current carrying conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the force experienced by a current-carrying conductor in a uniform magnetic field, described by the equation F = ILB. It clarifies that while the conductor generates its own magnetic field (B1), it does not interact with it; instead, it only interacts with the external magnetic field (B). The force on the wire is calculated using the external field, and the resultant magnetic field around the wire is determined through vector summation of both fields. The distinction between the force on the wire and the force in its vicinity is emphasized, confirming that the magnetic field from the wire at its own location is considered negligible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Familiarity with the equation F = ILB
  • Knowledge of magnetic field interactions
  • Basic calculus for vector summation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Lorentz force law in electromagnetic contexts
  • Explore the concept of magnetic field superposition
  • Learn about the Biot-Savart law for calculating magnetic fields
  • Investigate the role of test charges in measuring magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electromagnetism and the behavior of current-carrying conductors in magnetic fields.

Physicslearner500039
Messages
124
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Force on a current carrying conductor
I am studying the theory of force on a current carrying conductor in a uniform magnetic field, the Force is ## F=ILB##. I am slightly confused here let us say the conductor is placed in the uniform magnetic field ##B##, then if the current is passing through the conductor then that current would also produce a magnetic field say ##B1##. Will these two fields B and B1 not interact with each other? Please advise.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
As a simple explanation, the wire will not interact with its own magnetic field, but will only interact with the external magnetic field. So when calculating the force on the wire, you only need to take into account the external magnetic field. At points in space around the wire, the resultant magnetic field can be obtained by the vector sum of the magnetic fields due to the wire and the external source (and you could measure it by, for example, using a 'test charge' of arbitrarily small charge).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicslearner500039 and berkeman
But in the textbook i am referring to it refers to only the external magnetic field but not the resultant magnetic field. Is it because the field of the current carrying conductor is negligible? May be i have to go through more thoroughly. Sorry i understood now.
 
Physicslearner500039 said:
But in the textbook i am referring to it refers to only the external magnetic field but not the resultant magnetic field. Is it because the field of the current carrying conductor is negligible? May be i have to go through more thoroughly.

As I mentioned, the wire will only interact with the external magnetic field. If ##\vec{B}## is the external field, then the force on a small charge element is ##d\vec{F} = d^3 x \rho \vec{v} \times \vec{B} ##, which means that$$\vec{F} = \int d^3 x \rho \vec{v} \times \vec{B} = \int d^3 x \vec{J} \times \vec{B}$$The force per unit length is then ##\vec{f} = \vec{I} \times \vec{B}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicslearner500039
Yes I have understood now, the distinction i have to make is force on the wire, force near the wire. The magnetic fields are not the same and hence the forces.
 
Physicslearner500039 said:
Yes I have understood now, the distinction i have to make is force on the wire, force near the wire. The magnetic fields are not the same and hence the forces.

Remember that you only get a magnetic or electric force when a field interacts with a charge, so it doesn't make sense to say 'force near the wire'. What you can say is that the field in the vicinity of the wire is obtained via the superposition (vector sum) of the magnetic fields from both sources.

I think the magnetic field due to the wire, at the position of any point on the wire, is undefined in any case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K