Forces between two immovable objects

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint.V8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces exerted by a hydraulic jack placed within a square steel frame, specifically whether the force is distributed equally between the top and bottom rails or if each rail experiences the full force of the jack. The scope includes conceptual understanding of hydraulic systems and force distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that since the hydraulic pressure is uniform, both the top and bottom rails experience 10 tonnes of force each.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the top rail experiences a 10 tonnes upward force and the bottom rail a 10 tonnes downward force, these forces do not combine to create a total of 20 tonnes.
  • It is noted that the jack itself experiences 10 tonnes of downward force from the top rail and 10 tonnes of upward force from the bottom rail, resulting in a net force of 0 tonnes on the jack.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the distribution of force and acknowledges a misunderstanding in their simulation model, realizing that they were incorrectly halving the load between the rails.
  • Another participant invokes Newton's third law, stating that if the jack exerts 10 tonnes, then that is the force each rail receives, using an analogy involving tension in a string.
  • A humorous remark is made about the possibility of the jack manufacturer being "cheeky" if the force were halved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how the forces are distributed between the rails, with some asserting that each rail receives the full force of the jack while others clarify the nature of the forces acting on the jack itself. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of force distribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference concepts such as equilibrium, compressive stress, and Newton's laws, but there are no explicit resolutions to the mathematical or conceptual ambiguities presented.

Saint.V8
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
This is most likely dead simple but my brain has shut down for the day!

Lets say a Hydraulic Jack is placed in a square steel frame so once the jack is operated it acts upon the top and bottom rails which are held in place by the two side rails...

The jack is pumped up to say 10 tonnes - does this mean that the top rail and bottom rail are receiving 5 tonnes each or 10 tonnes each?

My brain for some reason just won't tell me which one is correct and it is most frustrating!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since it is a hydraulic jack and the pressure is same everywhere in a hydraulic system, there must be 10 tonnes of force on both the top and bottom rails. It is not halved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saint.V8 and Dale
Saint.V8 said:
The jack is pumped up to say 10 tonnes - does this mean that the top rail and bottom rail are receiving 5 tonnes each or 10 tonnes each?
The top rail is subject to 10 tons upward force. The bottom rail is subject to 10 tons downward force. Those forces are on different objects and in different directions. They do not add to 20 tons.

The jack is subject to 10 tons of downward force from the top rail. The jack is subject to 10 tons of upward force from the bottom rail. Those forces act on the same object. They add - as vectors. Since they are in opposite directions, they add to a net of 0 tons. The jack does not move as a result.

The jack is under a compressive stress of 10 tons. If you were to slice the jack in two at any point, you would find the two halves pushing on each other with 10 tons of force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saint.V8 and Dale
jbriggs444 said:
The top rail is subject to 10 tons upward force. The bottom rail is subject to 10 tons downward force. Those forces are on different objects and in different directions. They do not add to 20 tons.

The jack is subject to 10 tons of downward force from the top rail. The jack is subject to 10 tons of upward force from the bottom rail. Those forces act on the same object. They add - as vectors. Since they are in opposite directions, they add to a net of 0 tons. The jack does not move as a result.

The jack is under a compressive stress of 10 tons. If you were to slice the jack in two at any point, you would find the two halves pushing on each other with 10 tons of force.
The fact that our two posts are often seconds within each other is uncanny.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saint.V8 and jbriggs444
You bunch of superstars...now it has been explained, it is dead simple really...

For some unknown reason, my brain couldn't fathom out which side of the argument was correct - I have been working on a simulation model and the results it was giving me just didn't seem right, and it is because I was halving the total load between the rails...rather than ensuring the jack was in equilibrium within the system.

You wouldn't think I am 39 years and been doing this sort of thing for most of my working life...I just had a total brain failure.

Many thanks chaps for keeping me sane!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213, jbriggs444 and lekh2003
Newton's third law applies here. If the jack is pushing with 10 tons weight then that is what each rail is getting.
It could be easier if you think in terms of tension. Imagine a string holding up a 2kg mass via a spring balance It will be pulling with the 20N (approx) up on the mass and down on the hook in the ceiling with 20N.
The only time the forces will be less is if the forces at one end are in the same direction and 'shared', say there are two hooks in the ceiling and a Vee in the string - 10N each, then.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saint.V8
Saint.V8 said:
The jack is pumped up to say 10 tonnes - does this mean that the top rail and bottom rail are receiving 5 tonnes each...
Only if the jack manufacturer was very cheeky.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
885
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K