Forces in a Truss: Solve for AB Force

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter canicon25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Truss
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for the force in member AB of a truss structure using the method of joints. The user inquires about sectioning the truss through members AB, BE, and EF while disregarding fixed connections. A participant suggests calculating the reaction forces at points A and E by taking components and moments, ultimately confirming a calculated force of 36 kN in member AB, indicating a potential typo in the provided solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of truss analysis and the method of joints
  • Knowledge of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with calculating reaction forces in structures
  • Basic proficiency in structural engineering concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of joints in truss analysis
  • Learn how to calculate reaction forces in static structures
  • Explore common errors in truss problem solutions
  • Review examples of force calculations in truss members
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in analyzing truss systems and solving for internal forces in structural members.

canicon25
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/3825/truss3.jpg
I am having some problems with this one. Can I section the truss through members AB, BE and EF to solve for the force in AB, thus disregarding the fixed connections at left? I suppose I could go join by join, but I would like to section if possible.

Any help would be great.

**MODS Can you move this into the homework section. I just noticed your sticky but already created the thread ***
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi canicon25! :wink:

have you tried finding the reaction force at A and E, by taking components and moments? :smile:
 
i used method of joints and went one by one with this one after all. i think the provided solution is an error; i worked out 36kN twice. typo i think.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K