Forces on the slope of a triangular block

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the forces acting on a triangular block on an incline. The participant initially neglects the Y forces, believing the normal force balances the gravitational component in that direction. However, it is clarified that the acceleration of the block has a Y component that must be considered, impacting the overall force calculations. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law and recognizing that both the X and Y components contribute to the system's acceleration. The discrepancy between the participant's solution and the answer book arises from this oversight regarding the Y forces.
caspeerrr
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I uploaded the question as an attached file.

Homework Equations


Fz = mg , F = ma ,

The Attempt at a Solution


The slope : x
Perpendicular to the slope: y
I thought the Y forces can be neglected because the normal force counters the y component of the gravitational force.
Fz,x = mg sinθ
Without an external force, Fz,x is the only force along the x-axis. So the acceleration a=F/m. This acceleration must be equal to the acceleration of the big block, so F=Ma = (mgsinθ)/m * M = Mgsinθ.
This seems logical to me but the answer book states a totally different answer: (m+M)gtanθ.
What did I do wrong?
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Knipsel.PNG
    Knipsel.PNG
    49.8 KB · Views: 594
Physics news on Phys.org
What we require here is for the acceleration of the block down the incline plane to be equal to the acceleration of the system along the plane:

##a\cos(\theta)=g\sin(\theta)##

Now, use Newton's 2nd law of motion to rewrite ##a##, and solve for ##\vec{F}##.
 
caspeerrr said:
I thought the Y forces can be neglected
The acceleration of the block has a component in the y direction, so the y direction forces contribute to it.
caspeerrr said:
The slope : x
Perpendicular to the slope: y
The hint said to use vertical and horizontal axes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top