Forecasting record temperatures

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the probability of setting a record temperature in 2009 based on the Central England Temperature series, which spans from 1659 to 2009. It concludes that if temperature fluctuations are random and independent, the probability of any given day in 2009 being a record is determined by the formula 1/n, where n is the number of years (351). Therefore, the probability that the 2009 record is the highest is 1/351, confirming that each year's record is equally likely to be surpassed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability theory
  • Familiarity with statistical independence
  • Knowledge of the Central England Temperature series
  • Basic grasp of random variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Central England Temperature series data analysis
  • Explore advanced probability concepts related to independent events
  • Learn about statistical significance in temperature records
  • Investigate historical climate data trends and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Climate scientists, statisticians, meteorologists, and anyone interested in understanding the statistical analysis of historical temperature records.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
The Central England Temperature series is the longest continuous weather chronicle, reaching back to 1659. What is the probability that any particular day in 2009 sets a record temperature there, assuming only random temperature fluctuations over the 350+ years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking that since the temperature fluctuations are random, then the records, one from each year from 1659 through 2009, are also random and independent. So now you have a list of 351 numbers which are equally likely to be ranked in any order (since these yearly records are random and independent). What is the probability that the 351st is the largest? I think this is the probability that the record for 2009 is the "record of the records." Maybe someone else could confirm this.
 
Last edited:
In such a situation, if there are n values in a list then the probability that a new value is greater than any of the values already on the list is 1/n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K