Can a Formula 1 Car Outperform a Rugby Scrum in a Race?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical performance comparison between a Formula 1 car and a rugby scrum in a race scenario. Participants explore various factors affecting traction, power, and the dynamics of both entities in a competitive setting, touching on technical aspects, safety concerns, and personal experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the safety of having a rugby scrum compete against an F1 car, citing the danger of players slipping and being run over.
  • One participant suggests that the performance of the F1 car is more about traction than raw power, noting that F1 cars rely on aerodynamically generated downforce and that their acceleration is optimized for their weight.
  • Another participant mentions a previous test by Top Gear, indicating that the force applied to the ground is crucial, and once the tires start to spin, the car loses effectiveness.
  • A participant points out that F1 cars require technical assistance to start moving, as the computer regulates the clutch, which complicates the dynamics of overcoming resistance.
  • One contributor proposes a strategy for maximizing friction by turning off the motor and lightly braking, although they acknowledge this might be seen as cheating.
  • A participant with a background in both F1 and rugby discusses the impact of tire compounds on traction, noting that the hard compound used in the video takes longer to reach optimal temperature and grip, which could affect performance.
  • Another participant reiterates that the F1 car's grip is largely dependent on aerodynamics, suggesting that it may not be the best vehicle to demonstrate "off the line" power.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the feasibility and safety of the scenario, with multiple competing views on the factors influencing performance, such as traction, tire choice, and the role of aerodynamics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which entity would outperform the other.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions about tire compounds, ground surface conditions, and the technical capabilities of the F1 car, which may affect the overall analysis.

Messages
19,873
Reaction score
10,872
Not saying this is fake, but it seems pretty incredible to me. Can anyone shine some light on this?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beyond being stupidly dangerous?
 
Borg said:
Beyond being stupidly dangerous?
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
Well, they are rugby players so they're probably used to it. :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule and Nick tringali
I think it is not about power, it is about traction. Technically F1 cars are grounded airplanes. At the start they have only to accelerate themselves, i.e. about 500 kg. In the video likely 50 kg less (fuel). The racing speed comes from the aerodynamically generated downforce. So there is no extra downforce here and optimizing acceleration means optimizing for 500 kg. During the race the cars become faster as they loose weight.
So the entire setup isn't optimized for power rather it is for speed. In addition traction depends on air- and road-temperature, chosen tires and so on. I'm not surprised.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Top Gear did a similar test a few years ago with a tug of war team, it's down to the force you can put onto the ground, once the tyres start to spin the car has lost it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
You can't even get it rolling without technical help. A computer regulates the clutch. Otherwise you stall the engine. So part of the equation is not only the tires but the computer program, too, and this isn't programmed to overcome additional resistance. And because F1 cars are airplanes a more powerful car can't even overtake a slower one (beside on an endless straight like on salt lakes). So they have invented tricks to make it happen.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
There seems to be more "spin" going on than just the tires :wink:
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
1oldman2 said:
There seems to be more "spin" going on than just the tires :wink:
Plus: real Rugby players do not slip in a scrum! Never!

R.I.P. Jerry Collins
 
  • #10
Hmm, what strategy maximizes the F1 cars friction? It would guess turning off the motor and braking lightly enough that the brakes slip a little but the tires don't. This can be done indefinitely. Wait until the rugby players get tired before firing up the engine.

But that does seem kind of like cheating.

My car has anti-lock brakes but to me they seem to be completely ineffective. Light braking is better.
 
  • #11
I wanted to chime in for no other reason than I'm a big F1 fan myself (and former rugby player). In this instance, the traction of the car is going to be affected by the ground surface and the compound of tyre (for the most part). We can't see anything about the surface other than it's asphalt but the car is utilizing the 'hard' compound of tyre - it's called the hard compound because it's the hardest tyre that car has been fitted with (I can tell this because of the orange band around the inside of the tyre). Additionally, that compound also takes the most time to get up to proper working temperature to maximize grip; however, spinning the wheels as in the video will quickly overheat them and the tread will simply get worn away. Perhaps the car could have been fitted with 'supersoft' tyres that would provide more grip over the tyre featured in the video. Interesting that the result seems to be a draw between car and scrum :smile:.

As some have alluded to, the F1 car isn't really the best choice to demonstrate "off the line" power since much of the grip generated by the car comes from aerodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #12
Nosebuckle said:
As some have alluded to, the F1 car isn't really the best choice to demonstrate "off the line" power since much of the grip generated by the car comes from aerodynamics.

Like my daddy told me, when driving against a rugby scrum, heavy is better.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K