I Formula For Calculating Field Angle (Beam Angle) of Light?

meeshu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
There are actually several questions.

The formula for calculating the "beam angle" of light (emitted from lights bulbs, flashlights etc) is -

α = 2 arcCos ( 1 - Lm ÷ ( 2 π Cd ))

Where, α = beam angle in degrees
Lm = luminous flux (Lumens)
Cd = luminous intensity (Candela)

The above formula is simply a rearrangement of the equation -

Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) )

The beam angle formula above indicates the angle of light beam where the beam intensity falls off to 50% of the beam maximum intensity (apparently).

First question:
How is the equation Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) ) derived?

Second question:
How do we know that this equation applies only to 50% beam intensity?

There is another angle of light known as the "field angle", where the light beam angle is determined where the beam intensity falls to 10% of the maximum intensity. The field angle is greater than the beam angle.

Third question:
What is the formula for calculating light field angle?

Thanks for any and all constructive comments!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, meeshu, I'm afraid I cannot help you, haven't got idea. The Internet doesn't help you? YouTube, for example. Have you got PC, or just a mobile? Have you got a library near? Sorry, I cannot provide anything but questions. How did you acquired the background? Wouldn't you prefer to tackle one question, just to start moving?
Greetings!:smile:
 
Thanks for your comments.

I had already searched the internet before posting this topic. I didn't get satisfactory results from the searches at that time.

After more searches I believe the first question has been answered, courtesy of information from this
link here !

But from another equation,

Lumen = Candela x Steradian, where the solid angle steradian equals 2 π ( 1 - Cos (α ÷ 2) )

So the lumen equation becomes -

Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) ) as per the same equation mentioned in my first post.

But my second question as to why this equation only relates to beam intensity falling off to 50% instead of the entire beam intensity falling off to 0, has not been answered!

It is not clear why the equation only applies to 50% beam intensity?? That seems a bit odd!

In summary, to date, there are two remaining questions yet to be answered -

Why does the equation only apply up to 50% beam intensity?

And, what is the equation for calculating light beam "field angle" where the beam intensity falls down to 10% of the initial (maximum) beam intensity?


Maybe these questions should be in a "photometric" or similar sub-forum, but I don't think there is such a sub-forum here(?)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top