I Formula For Calculating Field Angle (Beam Angle) of Light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for calculating the beam angle of light, defined as α = 2 arcCos (1 - Lm ÷ (2 π Cd)), where Lm is luminous flux and Cd is luminous intensity. The beam angle indicates where the intensity of light falls to 50% of its maximum. Two key questions remain unanswered: the derivation of the equation Lm = 2 π Cd (1 - Cos (α ÷ 2)) and why it specifically applies to 50% intensity rather than 0%. Additionally, there is interest in the formula for calculating the field angle, where intensity drops to 10% of the maximum. The thread highlights a need for further clarification on these photometric concepts.
meeshu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
There are actually several questions.

The formula for calculating the "beam angle" of light (emitted from lights bulbs, flashlights etc) is -

α = 2 arcCos ( 1 - Lm ÷ ( 2 π Cd ))

Where, α = beam angle in degrees
Lm = luminous flux (Lumens)
Cd = luminous intensity (Candela)

The above formula is simply a rearrangement of the equation -

Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) )

The beam angle formula above indicates the angle of light beam where the beam intensity falls off to 50% of the beam maximum intensity (apparently).

First question:
How is the equation Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) ) derived?

Second question:
How do we know that this equation applies only to 50% beam intensity?

There is another angle of light known as the "field angle", where the light beam angle is determined where the beam intensity falls to 10% of the maximum intensity. The field angle is greater than the beam angle.

Third question:
What is the formula for calculating light field angle?

Thanks for any and all constructive comments!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, meeshu, I'm afraid I cannot help you, haven't got idea. The Internet doesn't help you? YouTube, for example. Have you got PC, or just a mobile? Have you got a library near? Sorry, I cannot provide anything but questions. How did you acquired the background? Wouldn't you prefer to tackle one question, just to start moving?
Greetings!:smile:
 
Thanks for your comments.

I had already searched the internet before posting this topic. I didn't get satisfactory results from the searches at that time.

After more searches I believe the first question has been answered, courtesy of information from this
link here !

But from another equation,

Lumen = Candela x Steradian, where the solid angle steradian equals 2 π ( 1 - Cos (α ÷ 2) )

So the lumen equation becomes -

Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) ) as per the same equation mentioned in my first post.

But my second question as to why this equation only relates to beam intensity falling off to 50% instead of the entire beam intensity falling off to 0, has not been answered!

It is not clear why the equation only applies to 50% beam intensity?? That seems a bit odd!

In summary, to date, there are two remaining questions yet to be answered -

Why does the equation only apply up to 50% beam intensity?

And, what is the equation for calculating light beam "field angle" where the beam intensity falls down to 10% of the initial (maximum) beam intensity?


Maybe these questions should be in a "photometric" or similar sub-forum, but I don't think there is such a sub-forum here(?)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top