I Formula For Calculating Field Angle (Beam Angle) of Light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for calculating the beam angle of light, defined as α = 2 arcCos (1 - Lm ÷ (2 π Cd)), where Lm is luminous flux and Cd is luminous intensity. The beam angle indicates where the intensity of light falls to 50% of its maximum. Two key questions remain unanswered: the derivation of the equation Lm = 2 π Cd (1 - Cos (α ÷ 2)) and why it specifically applies to 50% intensity rather than 0%. Additionally, there is interest in the formula for calculating the field angle, where intensity drops to 10% of the maximum. The thread highlights a need for further clarification on these photometric concepts.
meeshu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
There are actually several questions.

The formula for calculating the "beam angle" of light (emitted from lights bulbs, flashlights etc) is -

α = 2 arcCos ( 1 - Lm ÷ ( 2 π Cd ))

Where, α = beam angle in degrees
Lm = luminous flux (Lumens)
Cd = luminous intensity (Candela)

The above formula is simply a rearrangement of the equation -

Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) )

The beam angle formula above indicates the angle of light beam where the beam intensity falls off to 50% of the beam maximum intensity (apparently).

First question:
How is the equation Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) ) derived?

Second question:
How do we know that this equation applies only to 50% beam intensity?

There is another angle of light known as the "field angle", where the light beam angle is determined where the beam intensity falls to 10% of the maximum intensity. The field angle is greater than the beam angle.

Third question:
What is the formula for calculating light field angle?

Thanks for any and all constructive comments!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, meeshu, I'm afraid I cannot help you, haven't got idea. The Internet doesn't help you? YouTube, for example. Have you got PC, or just a mobile? Have you got a library near? Sorry, I cannot provide anything but questions. How did you acquired the background? Wouldn't you prefer to tackle one question, just to start moving?
Greetings!:smile:
 
Thanks for your comments.

I had already searched the internet before posting this topic. I didn't get satisfactory results from the searches at that time.

After more searches I believe the first question has been answered, courtesy of information from this
link here !

But from another equation,

Lumen = Candela x Steradian, where the solid angle steradian equals 2 π ( 1 - Cos (α ÷ 2) )

So the lumen equation becomes -

Lm = 2 π Cd ( 1 - Cos (α ÷2) ) as per the same equation mentioned in my first post.

But my second question as to why this equation only relates to beam intensity falling off to 50% instead of the entire beam intensity falling off to 0, has not been answered!

It is not clear why the equation only applies to 50% beam intensity?? That seems a bit odd!

In summary, to date, there are two remaining questions yet to be answered -

Why does the equation only apply up to 50% beam intensity?

And, what is the equation for calculating light beam "field angle" where the beam intensity falls down to 10% of the initial (maximum) beam intensity?


Maybe these questions should be in a "photometric" or similar sub-forum, but I don't think there is such a sub-forum here(?)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top