Formula for Multiplying Two Elements in a Polynomial Ring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the multiplication of two polynomials in a commutative polynomial ring. Specifically, it establishes that for polynomials \( p(x) = \sum_{i=1}^m a_i x^i \) and \( q(x) = \sum_{j=1}^n b_j x^j \), the product \( p(x)q(x) \) can be expressed as \( \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} \left( \sum_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \right) x^k \). The proof utilizes mathematical induction, starting with base cases and extending to general cases, while emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying summation limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their representations
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques
  • Knowledge of commutative algebra principles
  • Ability to manipulate summations and series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in algebra
  • Learn about polynomial ring properties in commutative algebra
  • Explore the concept of polynomial multiplication and its applications
  • Investigate the significance of summation limits in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, algebra enthusiasts, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of polynomial operations and proof techniques in algebraic structures.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I would like to show that if ##p(x) = \sum_{i=1}^m a_i x^i## and ##q(x) = \sum_{j=1}^n b_j x^j##, then ##p(x)q(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} \left( \sum_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \right) x^k##, where the polynomial ring is assumed to be commutative.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The base case of ##m=n=1## is trivial; one just simply compares the formula to a "brute force" calculation. So, suppose that the formula holds for polynomials ##p## and ##q## where ##p## has length ##1## and ##q## has length ##n##. Then

$$p(x)q(x) = p(x) \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} b_j x^j = p(x) \sum_{j=1}^n b_j x^j + p(x)b_{n+1}x^{n=1}$$

By the induction, hypothesis, ##p(x) \sum_{j=1}^n b_j x^j = \sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \left( \sum_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \right) x^k##, and so

$$p(x)q(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \left( \sum_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \right) x^k + a_0 b_{n+1} x^{n+1} + a_1 b_{n+2} x^{n+2}$$

The term ##a_0 b_{n+1} x^{n+1}## can be identified with ##k=n+1## and ##a_1 b_{n+2} x^{n+2}## will be the leading term. Hence,

$$p(x)q(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \left( \sum_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \right) x^k + a_0 b_{n+1} x^{n+1} + a_1 b_{n+2} x^{n+2}$$

I feel that this last point is a bit shaky, but I'll let you be the judge of that. By commutativity and symmetry we get the other induction. Now for the double induction. Assume the formula holds for polynomials of length ##m## and ##n##. Then

$$p(x)q(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{m+1} a_i x^i \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} b_j x^j = \left( \sum_{i=1}^{m} a_i x^i + a_{m+1} x^{m+1} \right) \left(\sum_{j=1}^{n} b_j x^j + b_{n+1} x^{n+1} \right)$$

$$= \sum_{i=1}^{m} a_i x^i \sum_{j=1}^{n} b_j x^j + \sum_{i=1}^m a_i b_{n+1} x^{i+n+1} + \sum_{j=1} a_{m+1} b_j x^{j + m+1} + a_{m+1} b_{n+1} x^{m+n+2}$$

At this point, I can apply the induction hypothesis on the first term, but I am unsure how to properly combine this mess to get the desired formula...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A suggestion: don't confuse the length with the degree of a polynomial , a polynomial of length ##1## can have a degree ##m##, so it is of the following monomial form ##P(x)=a_{m}x^{m}##. For the rest the induction is the correct idea ...
 
Bashyboy said:

Homework Statement


I would like to show that if ##p(x) = \sum_{i=1}^m a_i x^i## and ##q(x) = \sum_{j=1}^n b_j x^j##, then ##p(x)q(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{m+n} \left( \sum_{i+j=k} a_i b_j \right) x^k##, where the polynomial ring is assumed to be commutative.

...

Fix up the lower summation limits: they should all start at either 0 or at 1 (and, preferably, all at 0).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K