Formulating the correct least action expression

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on formulating the correct Lagrangian for a physical system to derive governing equations via the Euler-Lagrange equation. Key conclusions include the necessity for the Lagrangian to be gauge invariant and Lorentz invariant, particularly for relativistic systems. It is emphasized that the Lagrangian should include terms like (dx/dt)² for single particles and d∅/dt² for fields. Ultimately, while general guidelines exist, the correct Lagrangian cannot be derived from first principles but rather through experimentation and adherence to these invariance properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Knowledge of gauge invariance and Lorentz invariance
  • Basic concepts of phase space and field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gauge invariance in theoretical physics
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Explore the implications of Lorentz invariance in relativistic physics
  • Investigate the role of quadratic terms in Lagrangian formulations
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in theoretical physics, Lagrangian mechanics, and anyone involved in formulating physical theories that require adherence to invariance principles.

qtm912
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I am trying to understand how, for a given physical system it is possible to come up with the correct expression for the lagrangian and thence the least action formulation from which the governing equations can be derived by application of the euler lagrange equation. From what I have seen so far (and I may be mistaken) this seems to involve some intelligent guesswork. So I conclude as follows :

- the lagrangian (or if not the lagrangian then the least action) must be chosen so that it is gauge invariant

- the lagrangian should contain terms like (dx/dt) squared for single particles where x represents phase space and correspondingly for a field ∅, with terms in d∅/dt squared

- for relativistic systems the lagrangian (or the least action?) should also be lorenz invariant

Then through a process of experimentation the lagrangian and corresponding least action can be found.

This is my understanding so far and I am asking if this (ie any of the above) is correct.

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general Lagrangian is simply the Lagrangian which leads to the correct equations of motion (i.e. the one that agrees with experiment). There are some general "guidelines" that you can follow if you want your theory to obey some properties, but that's about it. You cannot, in general, find the correct Lagrangian of a theory from first principles.

If you want your theory to be Lorentz invariant, then the action must be Lorentz invariant. If you want your theory to be generally covariant, then the action should be a scalar (in the sense that it is coordinate system independent). If you want your field equations to be linear, then you need a quadratic term in the fields in your Lagrangian.

There are just some general guidelines; however.
 
Thank you Matterwave for clarifying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K