Found an interesting book on Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the book "Quantum Mechanics for Engineers" by Dommelen, which is available for free in both PDF and HTML formats. Users express appreciation for the book's structure, which begins with a review of undergraduate concepts and progresses to more advanced topics. The discussion highlights the importance of a solid understanding of classical mechanics, particularly Hamiltonian and Lagrangian dynamics, as well as mathematical foundations in complex analysis and linear algebra for comprehending quantum mechanics. Users also mention the engaging style of the author, who incorporates humor into the text.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics and electromagnetism
  • Strong background in complex analysis
  • Knowledge of linear algebra and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the HTML version of "Quantum Mechanics for Engineers" for interactive learning
  • Watch lectures by Professor Balakrishnan to complement the book's content
  • Study classical mechanics to strengthen foundational knowledge
  • Review complex analysis and linear algebra concepts relevant to quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those interested in quantum mechanics and its mathematical foundations.

smodak
Messages
457
Reaction score
249
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Demystifier and jasonRF
Physics news on Phys.org
Very nice, thanks! I like the title :smile:

I've bookmarked it and will go through it more soon. I like how it starts with a review of what I learned in undergrad and moves on to subjects I've read about on the PF and beyond. Thanks @smodak :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: smodak
berkeman said:
Very nice, thanks! I like the title :smile:

I've bookmarked it and will go through it more soon. I like how it starts with a review of what I learned in undergrad and moves on to subjects I've read about on the PF and beyond. Thanks @smodak :smile:

Thank you. I downloaded the pdf to read, however, i actually find the HTML version easier to follow (the HTML version is also hot linked to solutions etc.). I was just watching this lecture by prof. Balakrishnan and then I read the corresponding section on the book, and I must say it was a pretty good experience. Now I know this material a bit, so, it will be great if someone who does not can comment on the quality. So far, in my experience, I think the book is very well written.
 
smodak said:
I am very interested to follow Balakrishnan's lectures. Just tell one thing: for starting quantum, do you need to go through the whole classical course? I have an idea of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian and also how to draw phase trajectories and understand autonomous systems. Is that enough?

By the way, thanks for the book :smile:
 
Wrichik Basu said:
I am very interested to follow Balakrishnan's lectures. Just tell one thing: for starting quantum, do you need to go through the whole classical course? I have an idea of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian and also how to draw phase trajectories and understand autonomous systems. Is that enough?

By the way, thanks for the book :smile:

In my opinion, you should be able to follow to some extent if you know the idea of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. However, he uses classical mechanics (and electromagnetism) a lot (for analogies etc.), so to really understand and appreciate, you will need to really understand classical mechanics well. He also goes on some tangents about l2 spaces and complex analysis so your math (complex analysis, linear algebra, differential equations) should be strong. My recommendation will be not to skip classical mechanics or any math prerequisites. It is a slower process but a more rewarding one. Unfortunately there is no shortcut to learning physics. Great lectures by the way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
von Dommelen, the author of the book, also has a good sense of humor. For instance, in Copyright and Disclaimer he says:
"However, in this web book, I do try to correct “inaccuracies,” OK, blunders, pretty quickly if pointed out to me by helpful readers, or if I happen to think twice."
Or at page 280:
"Normal people would therefore indicate it as O or 0. However, physicists are not normal people. They indicate the origin by Γ because the shape of this Greek letter reminds them of a gallows. Physicists just love gallows humor."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, vanhees71, smodak and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K