Participants shared their experiences with an online IQ test from Mensa, discussing their scores and the test's structure. Many found the test enjoyable, particularly due to its mix of verbal and non-verbal reasoning, though some criticized the prevalence of anagram questions, arguing they don't accurately measure intelligence. Scores varied, with some achieving high marks like 28 or 30, while others felt they could improve with more time. There was a consensus that repeated exposure to IQ tests could lead to better performance, which raises questions about the validity of such tests. The discussion also touched on the perception of IQ tests in relation to academic fields, with some believing they are more relevant for logical majors like physics. A few participants expressed skepticism about Mensa and IQ tests in general, suggesting alternative assessments like Raven's Progressive Matrices for a more accurate measure of intelligence. Overall, the conversation highlighted differing opinions on the effectiveness and relevance of IQ testing.