Fourier Series: To Factor or Not to Factor, That is the Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter doive
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulation of Fourier series, specifically the inclusion of factors of 2 in the coefficients and the series itself. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correct representation of the coefficients, particularly the factor associated with a0.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the correctness of the Fourier series formulation and question the presence of the factor of 1/2 in the coefficient a0. There are suggestions to verify the coefficients by substituting specific functions into the integrals.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking the formulation by substituting simple functions into the series. The discussion reflects a productive exploration of the topic, with multiple interpretations regarding the placement of factors being examined.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of conflicting notes and textbooks, indicating potential discrepancies in the understanding of Fourier series formulation. The original poster's uncertainty about the arithmetic suggests a need for careful consideration of the coefficients involved.

doive
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have conflicting notes and even textbooks about where i should and shouldn't have factors of 2 when doing Fourier series. I just want to check once and for all I'm doing it right and not introducing erroneous factors of 2 or omitting any

Homework Equations


[tex] \tilde{f}(x)= \frac{a_0}{2} + \sum^{\inf}_{n=1} [a_n cos(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) + b_n sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L})][/tex]

[tex] a_n = \frac{1}{L} \int^{L}_{-L} cos \frac{n\pi x}{L} f(x) dx[/tex]

[tex] b_n = \frac{1}{L} \int^{L}_{-L} sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L}) f(x) dx[/tex]

[tex] a_0 = \frac{1}{2L} \int^{L}_{-L} f(x) dx[/tex]

where the interval is [-L,L] and the period is 2L

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the above formulation correct (i'm particularly unsure about the 1/2L associated with a0)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just plug in the series for f(x) into the integrals and see if the coefficients work out correctly.
 
doive said:
Is the above formulation correct (i'm particularly unsure about the 1/2L associated with a0)

You have an extra factor of 1/2 associated with [itex]a_0[/itex]. To see that this is the case, set [itex]f(x) = 1[/itex]. Then according to your formulas, [itex]a_0 = 1[/itex] and the Fourier series is

[tex]\tilde{f}(x) = 1/2[/tex].

There should be a 1/2 either on the defining integral for [itex]a_0[/itex] or on the [itex]a_0[/itex] term in the series expansion, but not both.

You can check your other coefficients in a similar way by setting

[tex]f(x) = \cos(n\pi x/L)[/tex]

or

[tex]f(x) = \sin(n \pi x/L)[/tex]
 
thank you guys!

I had tried checking it but couldn't be certain it wasn't my dodgy arithmetic!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K