Fourier transform and translational invariance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between Fourier transforms and translational invariance in the context of scalar fields in d dimensions, as referenced in a specific paper. Participants seek to clarify the meaning of a statement regarding Fourier decomposition and its connection to translational invariance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for clarification on the relationship between Fourier transform and translational invariance as mentioned in the paper.
  • Another participant suggests that the author is referring to the translational invariance of the equation of motion for the scalar field ϕ.
  • A different participant questions the relevance of translational invariance to the process of Fourier transforming the field.
  • Some participants note that Fourier decomposition is distinct from a Fourier transform, indicating a potential misunderstanding of terminology.
  • One participant elaborates that the Fourier transformation applies to the x coordinates, allowing for the equation to be expressed for each mode of the transformed field separately, given that derivatives are only with respect to z.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the exact relationship between Fourier transforms and translational invariance, as participants express differing interpretations and raise questions about the terminology used.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential confusion between Fourier decomposition and Fourier transform, indicating a need for clarity in definitions and concepts related to the equations of motion.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
Can anyone explain what does the author mean by the statement below?
Let’s take advantage of translational invariance in d dimensions, ##x_μ → x_μ + a_μ## , to Fourier decompose the scalar field:

## \phi(z,x^\mu)=e^{ik_\mu x^\mu} f_k(z) ##
page 27 of this paperI don't understand the relation between the Fourier transform and translational invariance.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the author is referring to the translational invariance of the equation of motion for ##ϕ##.
 
The Bill said:
I think the author is referring to the translational invariance of the equation of motion for ##ϕ##.
What does that have to do with Fourier transforming it?
 
The author mentioned Fourier decomposition. This is not the same as a Fourier transform.
 
The Bill said:
The author mentioned Fourier decomposition. This is not the same as a Fourier transform.
He Fourier transforms the x coordinates and because the derivatives in the equation are only w.r.t. z, you can write the equation for each mode of the transformed field separately.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K