Fourier transform ##f(t) = te^{-at}##

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of the function f(t) = te^{-at}, with participants exploring the calculations and potential mistakes in both the forward and inverse transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the Fourier transform and the challenges faced in obtaining the original function through the inverse transform. There are attempts to clarify the function being transformed and to explore alternative methods for computing the transform.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of the Fourier transform calculation, while others are questioning the steps taken in the inverse transform. There is an ongoing exploration of the issues related to singularities and poles in the context of the inverse Fourier transform.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the function's definition and the presence of singularities in the inverse transform. Participants are also addressing typographical errors in the problem statement.

DragonBlight
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Finding the Fourier transform of ##f(t) = te^{-at}## if t > 0 and ##f(t) = 0## otherwise.
Relevant Equations
##F(w) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} te^{-at}e^{-iwt} dt##
Doing the Fourier transform for the function above I'm getting a result, but since I can't get the function f(t) with the inverse Fourier transform, I'm wondering where I made a mistake.

##F(w) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{0}^{\infty} te^{-t(a + iw)} dt##
By integrating by part, where G = -a - iw
##F(w) = \frac{te^{Gt}}{G}|_{0}^{\infty} - \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{Gt}}{G} dt##

##= \frac{1}{G^2}##

Thus,
##F(w) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \frac{1}{(-a -iw)^2}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your function ##t^{-at}## as you write in the statement and title or ##t e^{-at}## as you have used in your computation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Delta2
I made I mistake. It's ##te^{-at}##
 
So, here is an alternative way: Fourier's trick (differentiating with respect to a parameter inside the integral)

Let
$$
G(a,\omega) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_0^\infty e^{-at} e^{-i\omega t} dt = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \left[\frac{e^{-at-i\omega t}}{a+i\omega}\right]_0^\infty = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{1}{a+i\omega}.
$$
Now,
$$
\frac{\partial G}{\partial a} = - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty t e^{-at} e^{-i\omega t} dt = -F(\omega).
$$
It follows that
$$
F(\omega) = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \frac{d}{da}\frac{1}{a+i\omega} =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \frac{1}{(a+i\omega)^2}.
$$

Why do you think there is a mistake?
 
DragonBlight said:
since I can't get the function f(t) with the inverse Fourier transform, I'm wondering where I made a mistake.
As @Orodruin has noted, you calculated the Fourier transform correctly, so it sounds like the problem is in your calculation of the reverse Fourier transform. Can you show us your attempt at that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
DragonBlight said:
I made I mistake. It's ##te^{-at}##
Edited title and Homework Statement to correct this typo.
 
vela said:
As @Orodruin has noted, you calculated the Fourier transform correctly, so it sounds like the problem is in your calculation of the reverse Fourier transform. Can you show us your attempt at that?

##f(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \frac{1}{(-\alpha -i\omega)^2} e^{i\omega t} d\omega##

I don't see how to find the residue since the imaginary part is ##\omega##. There's a singularity ##\omega = i \alpha##
I mean, if I had ##(-i\alpha - \omega)## I could find it.

I think I found. if I factor i at the denominator then I have a pole of order 2 at ##\omega = \frac{- \alpha}{i}##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K