Fourier transform of a functional

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of a function defined on the interval (0,1) with specific boundary conditions. The user computes the Fourier transform of the function and its derivatives, seeking to express the transform of higher powers of the function, such as x^2, in terms of the coefficients a_p. There is a consideration of whether the Fourier transform of a generic functional can be related back to the original function's transform. Integration by parts is mentioned as a potential method for deriving relationships, but the user expresses uncertainty about how to revert to the a_p terms. The conversation highlights the complexity of applying Fourier transforms to non-linear stochastic partial differential equations.
Irid
Messages
207
Reaction score
1
Hello,
I was wondering if such a thing even exists, so here it goes... Let's say I have a function x(s) (it is real, smooth, differentiable, etc.) defined on (0,1). In addition, dx/ds = 0 on the boundary (s=0 and s=1). I can compute its Fourier transform (?) as
a_p = \int_0^1 x(s) \cos(sp\pi)\, ds
and now I have a set of numbers a_p which contain the same information as the original function x(s).

The good news is that if I compute the same Fourier transform on the derivatives of x, i.e.
\int_0^1 \frac{d^2 x}{ds^2} \cos(sp\pi)\, ds = -p^2 \pi^2 a_p
I get an answer in terms of the a_p which I already know.

So here's my question:

What if I want to find the Fourier transform of higher powers of x?

\int_0^1 x^2 \cos(sp\pi)\, ds =\, ?

Can it be expressed in terms of, let's say, a power series in a_p?

\int_0^1 x^2 \cos(sp\pi)\, ds =\, ?\, \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n a_p^n

And what if I want to find the Fourier transform of a generic functional f[x(s)] (smooth, differentiable, etc.)? Is it related somehow to the Fourier transform of the original function x(s)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried integrating by parts? Note that a Fourier series has sine terms as well as cosine.
 
mathman said:
Have you tried integrating by parts? Note that a Fourier series has sine terms as well as cosine.

Well I'm trying to keep things simple here by requiring dx/ds = 0 at the boundaries, hence all the sine terms are zero.

I don't know what to make of the integration by parts. Here's what I get

\int_0^1 x^2 cos(ps\pi)\, ds = -2\int_0^1 x\frac{dx}{ds}\sin(ps\pi)\, ds

I don't see how can this bring me back to the a_p...
 
I am not sure where you are going. However if you integrate by parts again you will get the second derivative and a cos.
 
I'm trying to solve a non-linear stochastic PDE of the type
dx/dt = d2x/ds2 + F[x] + noise(t)

and I would really benefit if it could be done with the Fourier transform because then I only need the first few terms of the Fourier expansion to have enough information about the x(s).. of course, all of this is to be done numerically
 
Irid,

I'm not sure if this helps, but... the Fourier transform of a product ##f(x)g(x)## is the convolution of their respective FTs.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K