Fourier transform of a supergausian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The analytic Fourier transform of a Super-Gaussian distribution, defined as Aexp(-(\frac{x}{a})^{2n}) where n is a positive integer, does not have a straightforward closed form. The discussion highlights that while the Fourier transform corresponds to the characteristic function of the distribution, specific integrals from Gradshteyn and Ryzhik can aid in deriving the normalization constant. However, due to the complexity of the integral for exp(-x^μ + ix), a power series expansion is suggested for approximation, though it may yield an asymptotic series rather than a convergent one. Consequently, numerical methods may be necessary for practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and characteristic functions
  • Familiarity with Super-Gaussian distributions and their mathematical properties
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly involving Gamma functions
  • Experience with numerical methods for function approximation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Super-Gaussian distributions and their applications
  • Study the use of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik integrals for solving complex integrals
  • Learn about numerical Fourier transform techniques and software tools
  • Explore asymptotic series and their implications in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in signal processing, statistical analysis, or any field requiring advanced understanding of Fourier transforms and Super-Gaussian distributions.

modaniel
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone might know what the analytic Fourier transform of a Super-Gaussian is?
cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That depends on what you mean by "super-Gaussian" distribution. Do you mean fat-tailed distributions? (distributions with tails that fall off rather slowly compared to a Gaussian).

If so, then there are several kinds of fat tailed distributions, each with its own Fourier transform. The Fourier transform of the probability density function is just the characteristic function for the distribution, which are usually listed on the wikipedia page for the distribution of interest.
 
thanks mute for the reply. The supergaussian i refer to is the Aexp(-(\frac{x}{a})^{2n}) where n is positive an integer and is the order of the supergaussian.
 
Hm, that looks tricky. Looking in the integral book Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, I found two useful integrals. The first is

$$\int_0^\infty dx~\exp(-x^\mu) = \frac{1}{\mu}\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{\mu}\right),$$
which holds for ##\mbox{Re}(\mu) > 0## and can be used to find the normalization constant of your distribution. This is integral 3.326-1 in the sixth edition.

There does not appear to be an integral for ##\exp(-x^\mu+ix)##, so it's possible there may not be a closed form for the Fourier transform. However, you could expand the imaginary exponential in a power series and perform the integral term-by-term to get a power series representation of the Fourier transform. In this case, the following integral (3.326-2) is useful:

$$\int_0^\infty dx~x^m \exp(-\beta x^n) = \frac{\Gamma(\gamma)}{n\beta^\gamma},$$
where ##\gamma = (m+1)/n##.
 
I should note that a) the series won't actually be a power series (because the moments aren't powers of anything) and b) the series looks like it will be at best an asymptotic series, as ##\Gamma((m+1)/n)## will grow quite large as ##m## gets large, and so the sum won't actually converge.
 
Hi Mute, thanks for the replies. looks like i might have to stick to numerical transforms!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K