Fourier transform of wave packet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of a wave packet, specifically the function ##h(x,t)## and its Fourier transform ##\hat{h}(k,t=0)##. Participants are exploring the nature of the wave packet and the implications of including the real part in the integral representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to compute the Fourier transform while grappling with the inclusion of the real part in the integral. Some participants question the definition and role of ##a(k)##, while others provide its explicit form involving constants and the Dirac delta function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the definitions and properties of the functions involved. There is an exchange of ideas regarding the mathematical representation of complex numbers and their real and imaginary parts, indicating a collaborative exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of uncertainty regarding the nature of ##h(x,t)## as a wave packet and the implications of the integral's real part, which may affect the analysis. The constants involved in ##a(k)## are noted but not fully specified, suggesting potential constraints in the problem setup.

schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Consider ##h(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \Re\{a(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}\}\mathrm{d}k.## What is the Fourier transform ##\hat{h}(k,t)## evaluated at ##t=0##, i.e. ##\hat{h}(k,t=0)##? (##a(k)## is given, but I do not think it needs to be specified)
Relevant Equations
The Fourier transform (FT) ##\hat{f}(k,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x,t)e^{-ikx}\mathrm{d}x## and the inverse Fourier transform ##f(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \hat{f}(k,t)e^{ikx}\mathrm{d}k##.
I am unsure if ##h(x,t)## really is a wave packet, but it looks like one, hence the title. Anyway, so I'd like to determine ##\hat{h}(k,t=0)##. My attempt so far is recognizing that, without the real part in the integral, i.e.

##g(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} a(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)} \mathrm{d}k,##
then ##a(k)## is just the Fourier transform of ##g(x,t=0)##. However, I can not remove the real part from the integral and I am unsure how to proceed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schniefen said:
(##a(k)## is given, but I do not think it needs to be specified)
I disagree. What is a(k)?
 
DrClaude said:
I disagree. What is a(k)?
##a(k)=A2\pi\delta(k)+2B/((k-C)^2+B^2)##, where ##A, B## and ##C## are real constants. ##\delta## is the Dirac delta.
 
schniefen said:
However, I can not remove the real part from the integral and I am unsure how to proceed.

For complex numbers z and w, <br /> \Re(zw) = \Re(z)\Re(w) - \Im(z)\Im(w). However for w = e^{i\theta} = \cos \theta + i\sin \theta for real \theta you may prefer to write <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \Re(e^{i\theta}) &amp;= \frac{e^{i\theta} + e^{-i\theta}}2,\\<br /> \Im(e^{i\theta}) &amp;= \frac{e^{i\theta} - e^{-i\theta}}{2i}.\end{split}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schniefen

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K