Fourier transform of wave packet

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the uncertainty of whether the function h(x,t) represents a wave packet and the desire to determine its Fourier transform at time t=0. The user recognizes that the Fourier transform a(k) can be derived from g(x,t=0), but struggles with the presence of the real part in the integral. They provide the specific form of a(k) involving a Dirac delta function and a Lorentzian term, indicating the complexity of the problem. Additionally, there is a mention of properties of complex numbers relevant to the discussion. The conversation highlights the challenges in manipulating the integral to isolate the desired Fourier transform.
schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Consider ##h(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \Re\{a(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}\}\mathrm{d}k.## What is the Fourier transform ##\hat{h}(k,t)## evaluated at ##t=0##, i.e. ##\hat{h}(k,t=0)##? (##a(k)## is given, but I do not think it needs to be specified)
Relevant Equations
The Fourier transform (FT) ##\hat{f}(k,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x,t)e^{-ikx}\mathrm{d}x## and the inverse Fourier transform ##f(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \hat{f}(k,t)e^{ikx}\mathrm{d}k##.
I am unsure if ##h(x,t)## really is a wave packet, but it looks like one, hence the title. Anyway, so I'd like to determine ##\hat{h}(k,t=0)##. My attempt so far is recognizing that, without the real part in the integral, i.e.

##g(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} a(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)} \mathrm{d}k,##
then ##a(k)## is just the Fourier transform of ##g(x,t=0)##. However, I can not remove the real part from the integral and I am unsure how to proceed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schniefen said:
(##a(k)## is given, but I do not think it needs to be specified)
I disagree. What is a(k)?
 
DrClaude said:
I disagree. What is a(k)?
##a(k)=A2\pi\delta(k)+2B/((k-C)^2+B^2)##, where ##A, B## and ##C## are real constants. ##\delta## is the Dirac delta.
 
schniefen said:
However, I can not remove the real part from the integral and I am unsure how to proceed.

For complex numbers z and w, <br /> \Re(zw) = \Re(z)\Re(w) - \Im(z)\Im(w). However for w = e^{i\theta} = \cos \theta + i\sin \theta for real \theta you may prefer to write <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \Re(e^{i\theta}) &amp;= \frac{e^{i\theta} + e^{-i\theta}}2,\\<br /> \Im(e^{i\theta}) &amp;= \frac{e^{i\theta} - e^{-i\theta}}{2i}.\end{split}
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...