Fourier Transform Real Function Wave Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that the Fourier Transform \(\tilde{\phi}(k)\) of a real function \(\phi(x,t)\) satisfying a linear wave equation and the condition \(\phi(x,0)=0\) for \(x<0\) resides in the lower complex plane. The Fourier Transform is defined as \(\tilde{\phi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\phi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx\). The participant proposed using the Heaviside function to modify \(\phi(x,0)\) and applied the Convolution property to derive an integral equation. The conclusion reached in class confirmed that if the real part of \(\tilde{\phi}(k)\) is positive, it guarantees that \(\tilde{\phi}(k)\) remains in the lower complex plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transforms, specifically the equation \(\tilde{\phi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\phi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx\)
  • Knowledge of the Heaviside function and its application in signal processing
  • Familiarity with convolution properties in Fourier analysis
  • Basic concepts of linear wave equations and their solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Heaviside function in relation to Fourier Transforms
  • Explore convolution in Fourier analysis, focusing on its applications and implications
  • Investigate the implications of the linearity of convolution in solving differential equations
  • Learn about the conditions under which Fourier Transforms reside in specific regions of the complex plane
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in applied mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those working with wave equations and Fourier analysis.

VVS
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I hope somebody can help me with this.

1. Homework Statement

I am supposed to show that if there is a function \phi(x,t) which is real, satisfies a linear wave equation and which satisfies \phi(x,0)=0 for x&lt;0 then the Fourier Transform \tilde{\phi}(k) of \phi(x,0) is in the lower complex plane.

Homework Equations


The Fourier Transform of \phi(x,0) is \tilde{\phi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\phi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically my idea was to multiply \phi(x,0) by the Heaviside function, since that would make no difference and then take the Fourier Transform: \tilde{\phi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\phi(x,0)u(x)e^{-ikx}dx. Then you can use the Convolution property and write: \tilde{\phi}(k)=\mathbb{F}(\phi(x,0))*\mathbb{F}(u(x))=\mathbb{F}(\phi(x,0))*\frac{1}{2}\left(\delta(k)+\frac{1}{ik}\right). Then you can use the linearity of the convolution and you obtain an integral equation:
\tilde{\phi}(k)=\tilde{\phi}(k)*\frac{1}{ik}
Then I can split \tilde{\phi}(k)=\tilde{\phi_{re}}(k)+i\tilde{\phi_{im}}(k)
So basically the real part is the imaginary part convolved and the imaginary part is the real part convolved.
Now I am stuck. Somehow if I can show that the real part is positive then it will always be in the lower complex plane.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Hey thanks for the reply.
We solved the problem in class so there is no more need for help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K