Frame Dragging Around Spinning Black Holes: Implications

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Frame dragging around spinning black holes is a well-established phenomenon in cosmology, with implications for the behavior of space-time. The discussion centers on whether frame dragging causes space-time to rotate indefinitely around the black hole or if it ultimately leads to space-time being drawn into the black hole. The role of the accretion disk is also examined, questioning whether its mass contributes to or detracts from the rotational frame dragging effect. The consensus is that while space-time does not disappear into black holes, the dynamics of frame dragging and accretion disks warrant further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with black hole physics
  • Knowledge of frame dragging phenomena
  • Basic principles of accretion disks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of frame dragging in the Gravity Probe B experiment
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of accretion disks and their impact on frame dragging
  • Study the non-mathematical course on relativity by Ben Crowell
  • Investigate the curvature of space-time around rotating black holes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students interested in black hole dynamics, frame dragging effects, and the implications of accretion disks in cosmology.

Robert Friz
Messages
36
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
The question is whether the spin and extreme gravity of a black hole causes frame dragging to vector the fabric of space itself towards and into the black hole.
Frame dragging around a spinning black hole is generally accepted in cosmology. Does the frame dragging result solely in space-time rotating forever around the black hole, or does frame dragging ultimately result in space-time vectoring towards and into the black hole?

An additional question involves the accretion disk. Does the mass in an accretion disk add to or detract from the rotational frame dragging? Furthermore, since the matter in an accretion disk is moving towards the black hole while rotating around it, does the mass of the accretion disk create a vector for frame dragging space-time towards and ultimately into the black hole?

If either or both frame dragging mechanisms result in moving space-time itself towards and into the black hole, then the street-talk description might be that the black hole is "eating space-time". This has implications...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robert Friz said:
Does the frame dragging result solely in space-time rotating forever around the black hole, or does frame dragging ultimately result in space-time vectoring towards and into the black hole?
Spacetime doesn't rotate. You have to remember that it's a four dimensional entity - so "space now" is a different slice of spacetime from "space a moment ago". Space a moment ago doesn't change, move, or rotate (how could it?) and nor does space now. But spacetime around a rotating black hole is curved in such a way that inertially moving objects will tend to circle around the black hole.

So no, in short, spacetime is not disappearing into black holes. It isn't a thing that could do - "fabric" of spacetime is a vaguely evocative term that shouldn't be taken at all seriously.

Robert Friz said:
An additional question involves the accretion disk. Does the mass in an accretion disk add to or detract from the rotational frame dragging?
I would expect that the accretion disc does contribute to frame dragging. We have detected the effect from the Earth's rotation, so it seems reasonable that an accretion disc would generate it too, although the effect may well be negligible - I don't know how massive accretion discs are. I have not seen any maths to prove that conjecture, though, and I suspect it would require numerical solutions and be quite time consuming to do. It doesn't change anything about my first two paragraphs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. As an amateur, I have a very active imagination but no graduate level physics education, which results in going down blind alleys sometimes. Your help was appreciated!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
You're welcome.

A former mentor here, Ben Crowell, teaches a non-mathematical course in relativity. The course notes are a book, which can be downloaded free from http://lightandmatter.com/poets/, if you want a look. It's pretty good, and fairly honest about what can be understood without maths.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Ibix said:
You're welcome.

A former mentor here, Ben Crowell, teaches a non-mathematical course in relativity. The course notes are a book, which can be downloaded free from http://lightandmatter.com/poets/, if you want a look. It's pretty good, and fairly honest about what can be understood without maths.

Ben Crowell's course is indeed quite good. I have delved into it, and while a good deal of the material is familiar, it is presented in one of the most interesting and compelling formats I have encountered. Thanks so much for the reference.

Bob
 
Moderator's note: Moved thread to relativity forum.
 
I like this page from the Gravity Probe B experiment that describes a lot of the physics around frame dragging, etc:
https://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime4.html (note that you should also check out the pages on Netwon's spacetime, Einstein, etc they have a lot of fun info as well!)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Yes, the website you mentioned was interesting. GP-B was a fascinating experiment, with the design of, the protection of from outside forces, and the measurement of results ingenious. Thank you for the reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
913
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
658
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K