Free body diagram for a sliding contact

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two components, A and B, where component A is pushed down onto component B, which has an angled surface. The discussion centers around determining the angle at which component B is about to slide, considering the rough contacts and known coefficients of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss drawing free body diagrams and resolving forces in different directions. There are questions about the identification of forces and whether the approach taken is correct. Some participants suggest considering additional forces and constraints related to the movement of component A.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on force balances and questioning the assumptions made about the forces acting on the components. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that component A is constrained to move only in the Y direction, which affects the analysis of forces. There is also mention of the need to consider the interactions between A and B, particularly regarding the normal forces and frictional effects.

Racer_Rob
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Component A is pushed vertically down with a known force F into component B. The angled surface of B is parallel to the angled surface of A. The contact between A and B is rough and so is the contact between B and the ground. The coefficients of friction are known and so is the weight of component B.

Determine the angle at which component B is about to slide.

Homework Equations


See attached image.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've drawn the problem in frame 1. In frame 2 I've drawn a free body diagram of component B. In frame 3 I've resolved these forces into X and Y directions. I assume I then write equations for these two directions and determine the angle which makes the net force in the X direction equal zero.

Could someone please advise if I've identified the forces correctly and if this approach is correct, thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Mechanics problem.png
    Mechanics problem.png
    36.5 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
Racer_Rob said:

Homework Statement


Component A is pushed vertically down with a known force F into component B. The angled surface of B is parallel to the angled surface of A. The contact between A and B is rough and so is the contact between B and the ground. The coefficients of friction are known and so is the weight of component B.

Determine the angle at which component B is about to slide.

Homework Equations


See attached image.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've drawn the problem in frame 1. In frame 2 I've drawn a free body diagram of component B. In frame 3 I've resolved these forces into X and Y directions. I assume I then write equations for these two directions and determine the angle which makes the net force in the X direction equal zero.

Could someone please advise if I've identified the forces correctly and if this approach is correct, thanks!
What stops component A moving left?
 
In the system that this is from, component A is constrained such that it's only able to move in the Y axis.
 
Racer_Rob said:
In the system that this is from, component A is constrained such that it's only able to move in the Y axis.
So include a force for that. It is relevant.
 
So that's going to be a normal force on the left side of A equal to the sum of all the resolved forces that are acting in the -X direction i.e. μ1Fcosθ sinθ, and I'll need to include this in the force balance?
 
Racer_Rob said:
So that's going to be a normal force on the left side of A equal to the sum of all the resolved forces that are acting in the -X direction i.e. μ1Fcosθ sinθ, and I'll need to include this in the force balance?
Yes, it will provide the horizontal balance for A, but since it will affect the normal force between A and B do not assume it is equal to μ1Fcosθ sinθ.
 
Hm, will there additionally be a Fcosθcosθ term to add to that? I've got this from the X direction reaction force at the interface between A and B.
 
Racer_Rob said:
Hm, will there additionally be a Fcosθcosθ term to add to that? I've got this from the X direction reaction force at the interface between A and B.
I don't know how you are getting that. I don't think it is right.
You can avoid having to worry about the horizontal force on block A if you just look at the balance of the vertical forces on it. What equation do you get for that?
 
haruspex said:
I don't know how you are getting that. I don't think it is right.
You can avoid having to worry about the horizontal force on block A if you just look at the balance of the vertical forces on it. What equation do you get for that?
I've tried doing a force balance for block A first of all. I've written it out in terms of forces normal and parallel to the contact surface (rather than breaking these down into X and Y components.

http://i.imgur.com/TL0g7fr.jpg

If you think this looks somewhat correct I'll go on and do a free body diagram for B. :smile:
 
  • #10
Racer_Rob said:
I've tried doing a force balance for block A first of all. I've written it out in terms of forces normal and parallel to the contact surface (rather than breaking these down into X and Y components.

http://i.imgur.com/TL0g7fr.jpg

If you think this looks somewhat correct I'll go on and do a free body diagram for B. :smile:
The free body diagram for A should not know anything about the friction between B and ground.
Trust me, it will be a lot simpler if you just look at the vertical forces on A. Resolving normally and parallel to the surface with B will only add more unknowns and equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K