I Free electron path without a nearby proton

Tareq Naushad
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Quantum properties of an free electron outside atom
In absence of a positive electric field created by proton what type of behavior an electron shows? I am talking about a free electron like from a electron gun in deep space . Pauli's exclusion, orbitals, energy level etc. which are normal in an atom for electron will be absent for an electron out from an atom. So what type of quantum behavior it shows then ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It still has quantized spin and charge.
 
  • Like
Likes Tareq Naushad
thanks. what about its allowable energy level, uncertainty of position, momentum etc. because now it is not governed by the field of +ve proton
 
Tareq Naushad said:
what about its allowable energy level, uncertainty of position, momentum etc. because now it is not governed by the field of +ve proton
We're still solving Schrodinger's equation to find the wave function. Schrodinger's equation includes a term for the potential, which will be the Coulomb potential for an electron near a proton (whether bound or not) and zero for an isolated (and therefore obviously unbound) electron in vacuum.

The bound states will have discrete eigenvalues. The unbound ones will have a continuous spectrum (although there are some mathematical complications here that we can ignore for now) quantum mechanics still works: position/momentum uncertainty still works, Schrodinger's equation governs the evolution of the wave function, we can even in principle do a double-slit experiment with a beam of free electrons and produce an interference pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes Tareq Naushad
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top