Why Does a Free-Falling Object Not Have Zero Final Velocity Upon Impact?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinematics of a rock dropped from a ladder, specifically addressing the final velocity of the rock as it passes a 2-meter tall door before hitting the ground. Participants are exploring the implications of the time it takes for the rock to fall and the definitions of final velocity in the context of free fall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply kinematic equations to determine the initial and final velocities of the rock, questioning the interpretation of final velocity as zero upon impact. Some are confused about the time interval of 0.25 seconds and its relevance to the different segments of the fall.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants offering various interpretations of the time interval and the relationship between the height of the ladder and the door. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of kinematic equations, but no consensus has been reached on the specifics of the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the problem statement regarding the height of the ladder and the time interval, which complicates the analysis. The lack of explicit information about the initial height of the ladder is acknowledged as a constraint in solving the problem accurately.

Ineedhelpwithphysics
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
When I drop a rock from the top of my ladder, I notice that it takes 0.25 seconds for the rock to fall past our 2-m tall door and hit the ground below. What was the velocity of the rock when it passed the top of the door?
Relevant Equations
vf = v0 + at
∆x = v0t + 1/2 at^2
I am super stumped at this question, the answer key is telling me 6.78 downwards, i think I'm reading and observing the question wrong. Isn't final velocity 0 so why can't i do

0 = v0 -9.8(0.25)
-2.45 = v0

But when I use the second the equation
-2 (displacement of door) = v0(0.25) + 1/2 (-9.8)(0.25)

-6.75 = v0

Why am i getting two answers, it's clear the first equation is wrong but why is that? is the final velocity not zero, but it hit the ground and hitting the ground means 0 velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
Homework Statement: When I drop a rock from the top of my ladder, I notice that it takes 0.25 seconds for the rock to fall past our 2-m tall door and hit the ground below. What was the velocity of the rock when it passed the top of the door?
Relevant Equations: vf = v0 + at
∆x = v0t + 1/2 at^2

is the final velocity not zero, but it hit the ground and hitting the ground means 0 velocity.
Yes the final velocity (right before the event of hitting the ground) is not zero. Kinematics don't study collisions at least not in depth, so you should know that by final velocity here we don't consider the velocity after hitting the ground, but the velocity right before it hits the ground.
 
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
Homework Statement: When I drop a rock from the top of my ladder, I notice that it takes 0.25 seconds for the rock to fall past our 2-m tall door and hit the ground below. What was the velocity of the rock when it passed the top of the door?
Relevant Equations: vf = v0 + at
∆x = v0t + 1/2 at^2

I am super stumped at this question, the answer key is telling me 6.78 downwards, i think I'm reading and observing the question wrong. Isn't final velocity 0 so why can't i do

0 = v0 -9.8(0.25)
-2.45 = v0

But when I use the second the equation
-2 (displacement of door) = v0(0.25) + 1/2 (-9.8)(0.25)

-6.75 = v0

Why am i getting two answers, it's clear the first equation is wrong but why is that? is the final velocity not zero, but it hit the ground and hitting the ground means 0 velocity.

I'm kinda' slow sometimes, but unless you tell us the height of the ladder where the object was dropped, it's kind of hard to answer this question, no?
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
He says 2m tall door but not sure if he correct -edit it right now. Ah yes i guess it is implied height of ladder=height of door.
 
berkeman said:
I'm kinda' slow sometimes, but unless you tell us the height of the ladder where the object was dropped, it's kind of hard to answer this question, no?
it's not given it asks the height of the ladder after the first question.
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
it's not given it asks the height of the ladder after the first question.
WITW? What is the full Problem Statement?
 
oops the problem is abit more complex than what I thought.

Right now the full picture as I get it is that the ladder is a bit higher than the door, we let the rock fall with zero initial velocity and then (after time ##t_0##) the rock passes the top of the door, and after ##2.5sec=\Delta t## it is at the bottom of the door.
 
berkeman said:
WITW? What is the full Problem Statement?
When I drop a rock from the top of my ladder, I notice that it takes 0.25 seconds for the rock to fall past our
2-m tall door and hit the ground below. What was the velocity of the rock when it passed the top of the door?
How tall is my ladder?

You're suppose to take -6.78 m/s as the final velocity, the initial velocity is 0, acceleration is -9.8 m/s . Im assuming you use those values for this equation ∆x = v0t + 1/2 at^2. That is the displacement from the top of the door to the top of the ladder. You then add 2m + 2.3 m (displacement between the top of the door and top of the ladder) and you get 4.3m.

Answer key says: -6.78 m/s velocity when it passed the top of the door) and 4.3m (meter of the ladder) .
 
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
You're suppose to take -6.78 m/s as the final velocity, the initial velocity is 0, acceleration is -9.8 m/s . Im assuming you use those values for this equation ∆x = v0t + 1/2 at^2. That is the displacement from the top of the door to the top of the ladder. You then add 2m + 2.3 m (displacement between the top of the door and top of the ladder) and you get 4.3m.
You have to use the equation $$\Delta x=v_0 \Delta t+\frac{1}{2} g(\Delta t)^2$$ in two cases: One case is for the displacement from the top of door to the bottom of door (ground) and the other case for the displacement from the top of ladder to the top of door.

You did correctly the first case where you calculate ##v_0##=the velocity the rock has when it passes the top of the door=6.75m/s

But you don't tell us what you did exactly for the second case, that is how you calculate the displacement between the top of the door and the top of the ladder.
 
  • #10
Ehm now that I read the problem statement again, I feel an ambiguity on what exactly the 0.25sec time interval is for.. Is it for the time from the top of ladder till it hits the ground, for the time from the top of ladder to the top of door, or for the time from the top of door to the bottom of door-ground?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
If I interpreted the problem correctly (as I state in post #7) and with g=10m/s^2 the answers I get is ##v_0=6.75## and ##h=4.27m## h being the height of ladder.
 
  • #12
Delta2 said:
Ehm now that I read the problem statement again, I feel an ambiguity on what exactly the 0.25sec time interval is for.. Is it for the time from the top of ladder till it hits the ground, for the time from the top of ladder to the top of door, or for the time from the top of door to the bottom of door-ground?
I think i get it now.

6.78 is the initial velocity at the top of the door
To find the height of the ladder I would have to make 6.78 the final velocity, and the initial velocity 0
I find the time between the rock dropping from the top of the ladder to the top of the door.
Then using the kinematics equations I would find the displacement from the top of the door to the beginning of the ladder.
Then i would add that by 2.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #13
Delta2 said:
oops the problem is abit more complex than what I thought.

Right now the full picture as I get it is that the ladder is a bit higher than the door, we let the rock fall with zero initial velocity and then (after time ##t_0##) the rock passes the top of the door, and after ##2.5sec=\Delta t## it is at the bottom of the door.
No. the problem is badly stated. The only way this will work out is that the ladder is higher than the door and the 0.25s (not 2.5s) is the time interval from door top passage to ground impact. So the rock must be at nearly 8 m/s when it passes the top of the door. Find that number exactly and then you know the height of the ladder above the door. Done. Let us know the result. My (±10%) estimate is the ladder is about 5.2 m from floor
 
  • #14
hutchphd said:
No. the problem is badly stated. The only way this will work out is that the ladder is higher than the door and the 0.25s (not 2.5s) is the time interval from door top passage to ground impact. So the rock must be at nearly 8 m/s when it passes the top of the door. Find that number exactly and then you know the height of the ladder above the door. Done. Let us know the result. My (±10%) estimate is the ladder is about 5.2 m from floor
How did you find 8m/s there I find 6.75m/s (use g=10m/s^2).
 
  • #15
Because it takes .25s to travel 2m.
REV :During .25s it will add only 2.5 m/s so indeed at the top it will be 8-1.25=6.75m/s. My estimate was worse than i thought. Never do late night physics when you are old!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #16
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
Isn't final velocity 0
The "SUVAT" equations you are using are for the special case of kinematics in which acceleration is constant. When it hits the ground, the acceleration suddenly changes from g downwards to something huge upwards.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #17
hutchphd said:
Because it takes .25s to travel 2m.
Yes right, I used that too , full equation $$2=v_0(0.25)+0.5g (0.25^2)$$
 
  • #18
Delta2 said:
How did you find 8m/s there I find 6.75m/s (use g=10m/s^2).
The 8m/s was a ballpark number, not intended to be accurate.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and Delta2
  • #19
Your number is correct! My estimate was worse than intended and indicated (see my revision)
.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #20
It stumps me that this question has generated such an extensive thread. There really is not much more to it than writing down the
$$
\Delta x = v_0 t + \frac{gt^2}{2}
$$
of the OP and solving for ##v_0##. For the height of the ladder (above the door), just find the time of zero velocity and insert it into the equation above.
 
  • #21
Orodruin said:
It stumps me that this question has generated such an extensive thread. There really is not much more to it than writing down the
$$
\Delta x = v_0 t + \frac{gt^2}{2}
$$
of the OP and solving for ##v_0##. For the height of the ladder (above the door), just find the time of zero velocity and insert it into the equation above.
There was some confusion regarding which events were separated by 0.25s. The wording is unclear.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #22
haruspex said:
There was some confusion regarding which events were separated by 0.25s. The wording is unclear.
The statement in the OP seems pretty clear to me. If it takes 0.25 s to fall past a 2 m door, that would be the time from the top of the door to the bottom of the door. That would seem to leave little room for interpretation to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #23
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
is the final velocity not zero, but it hit the ground and hitting the ground means 0 velocity.
If you drop a rock from ##1m##, then it's velocity when it hits the ground is about ##4.5m/s##. And it takes about ##0.45s## to fall. That's free-fall motion. What it does after it hits the ground is a different matter. It might bounce up, sideways or shatter into several pieces that fly off in different directions. All that stuff is not captured by the equation ##v = gt##. How could it be?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K