Does a Free Particle Have Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy?

Click For Summary
A free particle experiences no forces acting upon it, resulting in no potential energy and its energy being entirely kinetic. The misconception arises that a particle at rest must possess potential energy; however, if a particle is in motion, it retains kinetic energy regardless of the absence of forces. Potential energy is relative and can be defined as any constant value based on the chosen reference point. The particle's state of motion depends on its initial conditions, not solely on the presence or absence of forces. Thus, a free particle can have kinetic energy if it was initially in motion.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Revered members,
A free particle is one which has no forces acting on it and since there is no forces acting on it, so there is no potential energy and E is entirely kinetic.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My doubt is, when no forces act on a particle, it should remain at rest and possesses potential energy only and Kinetic energy should be zero. How the converse happens here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what it would mean to say that there is "no potential energy" since potential energy is relative- that is, given any situation, you can choose the potential energy to be whatever value you like at anyone given point. However, your statement that "when no forces act on a particle, it should remain at rest" is not quite right. That is true only if the particle was initially at rest. If it initially has speed v (and so kinetic energy (1/2)mv^2) it will continue moving with that speed and kinetic energy. You can take the potential energy to be any constant.
 
Thanks a lot HallsofIvy.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K