Free product of non-trivial groups is non-abelian

  • Thread starter Thread starter James4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Product
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The free product of a collection of more than one non-trivial group is definitively non-abelian. This conclusion follows directly from the definition of the free product, which consists of all finite-length words formed from elements of the groups involved, ensuring that adjacent elements come from different groups. A specific example provided is the fundamental group of the wedge sum of two circles, π₁(S¹ ∨ S¹), which exemplifies non-abelian behavior. The discussion confirms that for any two non-trivial elements from distinct groups, their product does not commute, reinforcing the non-abelian nature of the free product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, particularly free products
  • Familiarity with non-abelian groups
  • Knowledge of fundamental groups in algebraic topology
  • Basic definitions and properties of group elements and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of free products in group theory
  • Explore examples of non-abelian groups and their characteristics
  • Learn about the fundamental group and its applications in algebraic topology
  • Investigate the implications of non-commutativity in group operations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those focused on abstract algebra and topology, as well as students and researchers interested in the properties of non-abelian groups and free products.

James4
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have to show that the free product of a collection of more than one non-trivial group is non-abelian.

But doesn't this just follow from the definition of the free product?
Or how would you tackle this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well... what definition of free product are you using, and how does non-abelian follow from it?
 
You mean the definition of the free product?

As a set, the free product  G consists of all
words g_1g_2.. .g_m of arbitrary finite length m > 0, where each letter g_i belongs to
a group G_ i and is not the identity element of G_ i , and adjacent letters g_i and g_(i+1‚)
belong to different groups G .

For a counterexample to being abelian i thought about:
\pi_1(S^1 \vee S^1) which corresponds to the free product of the fundamental groups of S^1 and which is not abbelian
 
So if you have two groups G and H, and you look at G*H, can you identify two elements in G*H which do not commute?
 
Hi Office_Shredder

Thanks for your answer.
>So if you have two groups G and H, and you look at G*H, can you identify two elements in G*H which do not commute?

Thats what I meant when I wrote in the beginning that it almost follows form the definition, because it holds for any two non trivial items g,h from G,H respectively that g*h is not the same as h*g.
 
James4 said:
Hi Office_Shredder

Thanks for your answer.
>So if you have two groups G and H, and you look at G*H, can you identify two elements in G*H which do not commute?

Thats what I meant when I wrote in the beginning that it almost follows form the definition, because it holds for any two non trivial items g,h from G,H respectively that g*h is not the same as h*g.

Yes, it's almost trivial. g*h is not equal to h*g if g and h are not the identities of their respective groups.
 
So is there actually something to prove here?
 
James4 said:
So is there actually something to prove here?

Not much. gh is not equal to hg because g isn't equal h and neither is the identity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K