A Frequency Domain and pixel size

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced when switching from a CCD camera with 6.7-micrometer pixels to one with 1.67-micrometer pixels in an off-axis digital holographic camera setup. The first-order interference pattern was successfully observed with the larger pixels but disappeared with the smaller ones. It is suggested that the smaller pixel camera may have a reduced sensor size, potentially cutting off low spatial frequency information. Further inquiries focus on the test image used, the appearance of the first-order pattern, and the dimensions of the image arrays. Understanding these factors is crucial for diagnosing the issue with the smaller pixel camera.
houssain95
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
what is the relation between pixel size of CCD camera and field of view in frequency domain?
I'm developing an off-axis digital holographic camera. Initially, I employed a CCD camera with 6.7-micrometer pixels and successfully observed the first-order interference pattern in the Fourier domain. However, when I switched to a CCD camera with smaller pixels (1.67 micrometers), the first-order pattern vanished. Can you explain why this occurred?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.,

Maybe the smaller pixel camera sensor was also smaller overall, so the sensor array fell within the first-order pattern. You unintentionally cut the low spatial frequency information by using a narrower camera.
What was your test image.
What did the first-order pattern look like?
What were the outer dimensions of the image arrays?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top