Frequency of Black body radiation HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of black body radiation emitted by a burner at 683K, which has a peak wavelength of 4.25×10^-6 m. The relationship between wavelength and frequency is highlighted, emphasizing that frequency can be derived using the speed of light. The calculated frequency is 7.07×10^13 Hz. Participants note the complexity of the relationship between peak wavelength and frequency, referencing Wien's displacement law and Planck's law. The question's level is debated, with opinions on whether it aligns more with introductory or advanced physics courses.
re496210
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If a black body is heated to a temperature T (in degrees K), the most intense radiation is at a wavelength lambda (in m), where λ·T = 2.9×10−3m*K. If the burner on your electric stove is at a temperature of 683K (really hot and glowing), find the wavelength of the most intense black body radiation emitted by it.

The wavelength is 4.25×10-6 m.

What is the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted by the burner in the problem above?

(I do not know how to find the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
re496210 said:
If a black body is heated to a temperature T (in degrees K), the most intense radiation is at a wavelength lambda (in m), where λ·T = 2.9×10−3m*K. If the burner on your electric stove is at a temperature of 683K (really hot and glowing), find the wavelength of the most intense black body radiation emitted by it.

The wavelength is 4.25×10-6 m.

What is the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted by the burner in the problem above?

(I do not know how to find the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted)

You've found the wavelength, now what's the relationship between wavelength and frequency? Hint: what's the speed of the waves?
 
Thank you. I figured out that it is 7.07x10^13 Hz
 
phyzguy said:
The peak wavelength and peak frequency are not simply related by lambda*nu = c. Try reading this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien's_displacement_law

Good catch, phyzguy. I had overlooked the variations of Planck's law with respect to wavelength, frequency, and wavenumber.

I wonder what level course this question is taken from? It's presented in a way that I would associate with introductory level, but the wavelength vs frequency subtlety for Planck/Wien I would peg at a more advanced level.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top