Fresnel Equations for a beam instead of a plane wave

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Fresnel Equations to a beam of light rather than the traditional plane wave scenario. Participants are exploring how to derive the reflection coefficient for a beam, considering different approximations and mathematical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering the use of the paraxial approximation and the specific case of a Gaussian beam. Questions about the applicability of spatial Fourier transforms are raised, alongside discussions on the differences between plane waves and beams.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing references and suggesting various approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the starting point of the Fresnel equations, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method for the general case.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to a specific problem in the "Fundamentals of Photonics" book, which may limit the information available for discussion. Participants express a desire for a concise explanation rather than a rigorous solution.

montealeku
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In many books we can find the derivation of Fresnel Equations (TE and the TM reflection and transmission coefficients), but always for the case of a plane wave. How can we go about obtaining the reflection coefficient if the incident light took the form of a beam rather than a plane wave?

We may use the paraxial approximation, or we may consider the particular case of a Gaussian beam at its waist, but I cannot figure out the solution for the general case. Any help is most appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note: The question is related to Problem 6.2-3 in the Fundamentals of Photonics book, by Saleh and Teich.
 
Could a spatial Fourier transform be used? I'd really appreciate if anyone could share his/her thoughts and perhaps provide more elaboration
 
The starting point of the fresnel equations is

\frac{1}{\mu_i v_i } (E_i-E_r) cos(\theta_i) = \frac{1}{\mu_t v_t } E_t cos(\theta_t)

So you can derive it for any electric field you want
 
well what is the difference between a plane wave and a beam, isn't it the electric field

And could you maybe explain your problem in more detail
 
sgd37,

First of all, thank you for your interest in the topic and your previous replies. The question, as I mentioned above, is taken from Problem 6.2-3 in Fundamentals of Photonics, 2nd Edition, by Saleh and Teich (and no further information is provided). My undestanding is that the book author is not asking for a formal and rigorous solution (as that proposed in the article that I was suggesting), but a short explanation of how could we deal with calculating the reflection coefficient if instead of the idealized case of a plane wave we had a beam (which does not need to be Gaussian). I was thinking of a spatial Fourier transform, but I am not sure... if anyone can think of a different approach, or detail a bit how to do it with the spatial Fourier transform (I am not keen on the topic), it would be most appreciated.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K