Fresnel Integrals, Contour Integration

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Vale132
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please let me know if this kind of posting of exact problems from a textbook isn't allowed; if that's the case I'll delete it immediately.

From Boas's Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, Third Edition: The Fresnel integrals, [itex]\int_0^u sin (u^2)\,du[/itex] and [itex]\int_0^u cos (u^2)\,du[/itex], are important in optics. For the case of infinite upper limits, evaluate these integrals as follows: Make the change of variable [itex]x = u^2[/itex]; to evaluate the resulting integrals, find [itex]\oint e^{iz}z^{-1/2}\,dz[/itex] around the contour shown. Let [itex]r \rightarrow 0[/itex] and [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] and show that the integrals along these quarter-circles tend to zero. Recognize the integral along the y-axis as a gamma function and so evaluate it. Hence evaluate the integral along the x-axis; the real and imaginary parts of this integral are the integrals you are trying to find.

(Note: I already solved the problem correctly, but I don't know how to prove the bold part above; see work below.)

(The "contour shown" looks like a quarter circle in the first quadrant, except that there is a small quarter circle (of radius [itex]r[/itex]) cut out around the origin to avoid the singularity there.)

Homework Equations



[itex]\oint f(z)\,dz = 0[/itex] when the function is analytic on and inside a simple closed curve.

The Attempt at a Solution



The contour integral is the sum of four integrals, and it is equal to zero since the singularity at the origin is outside the contour. I omit the integrals along the x and y-axes because I'm just wondering about the ones along the two semicircles:

[itex]\int_0^{π/2} e^{iz}Rie^{iθ}/R^{1/2}e^{iθ/2}\,dθ[/itex]

and

[itex]\int_{π/2}^{0} e^{iz}rie^{iθ}/r^{1/2}e^{iθ/2}\,dθ[/itex]


These were obtained by substituting [itex]z=Re^{iθ}[/itex] and [itex]z=re^{iθ}[/itex], respectively, into the contour integral given in the problem statement.

I can see that in the second integral, the [itex]r[/itex] in the numerator cancels with the [itex]r^{1/2}[/itex] in the denominator, and since [itex]r[/itex] (and therefore [itex]z[/itex]) are tending to zero, the integral tends to zero. Is this sufficient?

The second integral tending to zero as [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] makes less sense. Doesn't the numerator tend to infinity, and the denominator stay a constant 1, as [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex]? And substituting [itex]z = Re^{iθ}[/itex] into the exponential only makes things worse. I considered rewriting the exponentials using Euler's formula and examining their behavior, but I don't see how that would help.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does that work when [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] ?
 
lurflurf said:
$$e^{i R e^{iθ}}\rightarrow 0$$
very fast
compare to e^-x

It's not that simple. You wind up needing to estimate ##\int_0^{\pi/4} e^{-R\sin\theta} d\theta##. It doesn't even really go to zero all that quickly. But it does go to zero.
 
Last edited: