Friction and moving blocks on inclines

  • Thread starter Thread starter WarPhalange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving friction and the forces acting on blocks positioned on inclines. The original poster expresses confusion about the distribution of weight and forces between a square block and two triangular blocks, particularly regarding the horizontal and vertical components of the forces involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the distribution of forces acting on the triangular blocks due to the square block above them. Questions arise about the vertical and horizontal components of the normal force and how they relate to the weight of the square block. There is also discussion about the implications of symmetry and the angles involved in the setup.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about force distribution and the nature of normal forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between vertical and horizontal components, but there is still exploration of the underlying concepts without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the forces in a system with frictionless surfaces and the implications of the angles involved. The discussion reflects a learning process where participants are clarifying their understanding of the mechanics at play.

WarPhalange
This is a GRE question, but it's so basic I thought I'd just put it here. Here it is with the solution:

http://grephysics.net/ans/9277/6 The answer is "D" by the way.

So my problem is with the way the weight of the block is distributed.

I get that each triangular block only "feels" half of the square block, so M/2 of mass. But then they assume that's the horizontal force via some weird trig that seems pointless (I can't figure out where they get a square-root 2 from).

My understanding was that you get half of the block's weight pushing down on the triangular block, and half pushing it horizontally. So you'd have g*M/4 pushing straight down and (m+M/2)*g*u pushing horizontally, for each block.

Why am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the triangles are frictionless, they can only exert forces perpendicular to their surface. It's the vertical component of that normal force that must equal half the weight of the square block. (The weight of the block does not act directly on the triangles; the only force between block and triangle is the normal force.)
 
So if the Square Block (SB) is only exerting force downwards due to gravity, F = g*M/2, right?

Then what does the triangular block exert back? g*M/2 in the Normal direction, or g*M in the Normal direction in order to get g*M/2 straight up? If it's the former, it would seem like horizontal force is just g*M/4 in that case. If it's the latter, how come it is "pushing back" with more force than the block is pushing with on it?
 
WarPhalange said:
So if the Square Block (SB) is only exerting force downwards due to gravity, F = g*M/2, right?
No. That's just the vertical component of the force it exerts on the triangles. Mg is the force of gravity on the block, not the force that the block exerts on the triangles.

It's certainly true that the force the block exerts on the triangle must be equal and opposite to the force that the triangle exerts on the block.
 
Hold on, there are TWO triangular blocks here. Doesn't each only get g*M/2 of Force exerted on it? Then a further half of that goes towards the horizontal component?
 
WarPhalange said:
Hold on, there are TWO triangular blocks here. Doesn't each only get g*M/2 of Force exerted on it?
The vertical component of the force exerted on each triangle is g*M/2.
Then a further half of that goes towards the horizontal component?
What do you mean "half"? It's true that the vertical and horizontal components must be equal, since the triangles are at 45 degrees.
 
Doc Al said:
The vertical component of the force exerted on each triangle is g*M/2.

Sure. Each triangle gets half of the weight distributed on to it due to symmetry, right?

What do you mean "half"? It's true that the vertical and horizontal components must be equal, since the triangles are at 45 degrees.

Okay, so if the Square Block exerts M/2*g force onto a Triangle Block, the Triangle Block exerts M/2*g force back onto the Square Block vertically? Where does the horizontal component come in?
 
WarPhalange said:
Sure. Each triangle gets half of the weight distributed on to it due to symmetry, right?
As I said before, the vertical component of the force exerted by the block on each triangle equals M*g/2.
Okay, so if the Square Block exerts M/2*g force onto a Triangle Block, the Triangle Block exerts M/2*g force back onto the Square Block vertically? Where does the horizontal component come in?
The force between block and triangle is a normal force which acts perpendicular to the surface of the triangle. It has both vertical and horizontal components.

I suggest drawing a freebody diagram of the triangles.
 
I have, but I don't know what values to put where.

If the vertical component = M*g/2, then the horizontal is the same, because of the 45 degree incline? So because both the left and right blocks both exert M*g/2 force horizontally, but in opposite directions, the net force is 0 horizontally and only M*g vertically from both blocks, right?

So that much makes sense (if I explained it correctly). I *think* I'm understanding it...

Thanks a lot Doc Al. You really stuck with me even though it looked like I was a lost cause. I appreciate it.
 
  • #10
WarPhalange said:
If the vertical component = M*g/2, then the horizontal is the same, because of the 45 degree incline? So because both the left and right blocks both exert M*g/2 force horizontally, but in opposite directions, the net force is 0 horizontally and only M*g vertically from both blocks, right?
Right. Sounds like you've got it now. :wink:
 
  • #11
I should hope so, I graduate with a physics BS this coming year. :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
909
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K