Friction Torque and Lost Energy in Colliding Disks: Where Did it Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two disks with rotational inertia, which are set to spin and then collide, leading to a question about the average frictional torque and the loss of kinetic energy during the collision. The subject area includes concepts from rotational dynamics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of angular accelerations for both disks and the resulting angular speeds after a specified time. There is an attempt to determine the average frictional torque and the loss in kinetic energy. Some participants question the completeness of the analysis, particularly regarding the treatment of both disks.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the calculations and reasoning behind the energy loss, with some suggesting that working with symbols rather than numerical values could yield more accurate results. There is recognition of the need to consider both disks in the energy calculations, and multiple interpretations of the energy loss are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the calculated energy loss values and discuss the implications of small deviations in numerical results. There is an emphasis on the importance of accuracy in calculations and the potential for errors when using numerical values directly.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


Disks A and B each have a rotational inerita ##0.300 kg.m^2## about the central axis and a radius of of ##20.0cm##and are free to rotate on a central rod through both of them.To set them spinning around the rod in the same direction,each wrapped with a string that is pulled for ##10.0s## (the string detaches at the end).The magnitudes of the forces pulling the strings are ##30.0N## for a disk A and ##20.0N## for a disk B.After the strings detach,the disks happen to collide and frictional force between them to the same final angular speed in ##6.00s##
What are (a) magnitude of the average frictional torque that brings them to the final angular speed and (b) the loss in kinetic energy as the torque acts on them? (c) Where did the "lost energy" go ?

Homework Equations


##τ=rFsinθ##
##τ=I∝##

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the angular accelerations for both objects
For A-
##τ=rF=I∝##

##∝=\frac {rF} {I}##

##∝=\frac {0.2m.30N} {0.3 kgm^2}=20\frac {rad} {s^2}##
For B-
##∝=\frac {0.2m.20N} {0.3 kgm^2}=13,3\frac {rad} {s^2}##

For angular speed (w) which they pulled ##10 sec##, so ##w-w_0=∝t##
##w_A=20.10=200\frac {rad} {s}##
##w_B=13,3.10=133\frac {rad} {s}##

They are coming equal in 6 sec so the change in ##w_A## is ##200-(\frac{200+133} {2})=33.5\frac {rad} {s}##

so angular acceleration is ##∝=\frac {33.5} {6}=5.58\frac {rad} {s^2}##
so
##τ=I∝=0.3.5.58=1.67N.m##

For (b)

Initial rotational kinetic energy for A is from ##\frac 1 2Iw^2=(0.5).(0.3) (200^2)##
Last kinetic energy for A is ##\frac 1 2Iw^2=(0.5).(0.3) (166.5^2)##
The difference is ##1841,66J## which its not the correct answer..

Or I tried ##Δ(E_r)=W=τΔθ=1.67Nm.33.5\frac {rad} {s}.6s=335.67J##
but answer says its ##333J##
Where I did wrong ?

And for answer c is of course heat

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
Where I did wrong
You stopped looking after considering A. What happens to B ?
The 333 or 336 comes about because you calculate with numbers instead of symbols. The advice is to work with symbols as long as feasible; then -- in the final expression -- a lot of things cancel and you get a more accurate answer.
Additional benefit: less typing on the calculator, less chance for typing errors and easier approximate checks on the numerical outcome.
 
BvU said:
You stopped looking after considering A. What happens to B ?
Ok for B I found ##1504.98J## so the difference between them should give us the result whch its approximatly ##336J##
BvU said:
The 333 or 336 comes about because you calculate with numbers instead of symbols
I found ##W=τΔθ## I can't use symbols after this ?
 
If logic is correct then I don't think 333J or 336J matter so much..?
 
Arman777 said:
I found ##W=\tau\delta\theta## I can't use symbols after this
You can express both factors in terms of given variables. If you do that, the correct answer is exactly 1000/3 J. You should do that exercise.

In such a calculation in an exercise, a 1% deviation is considered an error. Loss of score for no purpose.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
Ok I found by ##W=I(w^2)##

##0.3.({200-(\frac {1000} {6}))^2}=W##

from there I found,but in exam or somewhere else I wouldn't do this probably...

Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
19K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K