From Effective Lagrangian to Feynman Rule

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zhangyang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feynman Lagrangian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transition process N*→N+photon and the challenges in calculating the amplitude using the interaction Lagrangian. Participants debate the use of the functional method versus the canonical approach for deriving Feynman rules. The consensus leans towards utilizing the canonical expression of fields and the expansion into annihilation and creation operators for clarity and ease in writing the rules, particularly within the path integral formalism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of interaction Lagrangians in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with Feynman rules and their derivation
  • Knowledge of functional methods in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in canonical quantization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Feynman rules from canonical quantization
  • Explore the application of functional methods in quantum field theory
  • Research the "center formula" for functional derivatives
  • Examine the path integral formalism in detail
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and advanced students seeking to deepen their understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and Feynman rule derivation.

zhangyang
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
In this process:

N*→N+photon

If we want to calculate the amplitude with the following interaction Lagrangian:

upload_2015-4-5_14-34-39.png


(http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0205052)

If we use functional method,the field operator is not polynomial,how to use "center formula"to bring functional derivative in? Or we must drop functional method,and use expension of field operator into annihilation and creation operator to get amplitude ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I honestly don't know how to write the Feynman rules for such a Lagrangian with the path integral formalism. Personally I always found much easier to simply use the canonical expression for the fields and from there write down the rules starting from the creation and annihilation operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K