From Heisenberg to Superposition states

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the logical progression from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to quantum superposition states. Participants outline the foundational concepts of quantum mechanics, emphasizing the role of non-commuting operators and the Schrodinger Equation in leading to superposition. There is a debate on the implications of linearity in quantum mechanics and the potential for nonlinear quantum mechanics to provide new insights. The current acceptance of nonlinear approaches is noted as being outside mainstream physics, suggesting caution for those exploring these ideas. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and evolving understanding of quantum theory.
skynelson
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
Hi All,
I am trying to remember the logical argument that leads from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to the existence of quantum superposition states.

Here's my sketchy version:

1) postulate of Quantization leads to non-commuting operators
2) This leads to Heisenberg Unc. Principle, and the concept of wave-like probability distribution (wave packet)
3) This leads to the evolution of the wave packet over time (Schrodinger Equation)
4) this leads to the concept of multiple simultaneous solutions to the Sch Equation (such as an infinite collection of solutions to the harmonic oscillator, each one representing a different possible energy level)

And there we have arrived at superposition states. Can someone revise this if it is incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would state it differently

1) QM uses a Hilbert space plus linear operators as building blocks
2) Linear operators automatically guarantuee the superposition principle (it is already used in the definition of "linear")
3) Canonically conjugate variables x and p are translated to operators satisifying [x,p] = i
4) For all non-commuting hermitean operators A, B a generalized uncertainty relation can be derived from the commutator [A,B]
5) The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is just a special case for conjugate observables with [A,B] = i
 
In nonlinear quantum mechanics you can have Heisenberg Uncertainty relations and no superposition principle stricte senso (time evolution is non-linear). See e.g. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C9707077/papers/art36.pdf" and references therein.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about current status and broad acceptance of nonlinear quantum mechanics?
 
Current status and acceptance of anything beyond "mainstream" is "not the mainstream physics" - thus risky and shaky. You better do not spend too much time with that, as you can easily loose your position. I mean unless you are Haag or Weinberg.
 
tom.stoer said:
What about current status and broad acceptance of nonlinear quantum mechanics?

and maybe with superposition (plus heinserberg principle).

On the nonlinear extension of quantum superposition and uncertainty principles.
Renzo Cirellia, Mauro Gattib, Alessandro Manià.

i think, maybe going beyond (alternative or unlike) Hilbert space, we can gain new insight on physics.
 
skynelson said:
Hi All,
I am trying to remember the logical argument that leads from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to the existence of quantum superposition states.

Here's my sketchy version:

1) postulate of Quantization leads to non-commuting operators
[...]. Can someone revise this if it is incorrect?

Operators on what ? That's right, linear / vector spaces. Linearity is thus assumed in your first assertion. It cannot be logically derived from it without circular agruments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K