On Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the generalized Heisenberg uncertainty principle, specifically focusing on Gaussian states and their properties in relation to the uncertainty relation. Participants explore whether all Gaussian states satisfy the uncertainty principle and examine the conditions under which equality holds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Gaussian states, particularly those that are solutions of the quantum harmonic oscillator, minimize the uncertainty principle with equality.
  • Others question whether this holds true for all Gaussian states, specifically those of the form ##\psi=Ce^{-\lambda x^2}##, and whether the inequality is valid for every positive value of ##\lambda##.
  • It is noted that any Gaussian can be used for systems that fulfill the Heisenberg algebra, but harmonic oscillator states are special due to their coherent and squeezed state properties.
  • A distinction is made between pure Gaussian states, which satisfy the uncertainty principle, and Gaussian states that are mixtures of other wavefunctions, which may not saturate the uncertainty relation.
  • One participant requests clarification on how the term "Gaussian" can apply to mixtures, prompting further exploration of examples.
  • An example of a correlated double-Gaussian wavefunction is provided, illustrating how marginal position and momentum statistics can be Gaussian but do not saturate the Heisenberg limit.
  • There is a consideration of whether non-pure states can achieve the uncertainty limit, raising further questions about the nature of mixed states and their relation to Gaussian wavefunctions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the uncertainty principle to various types of Gaussian states. While some agree on the properties of pure Gaussian states, others highlight the complexities introduced by mixtures, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of Gaussian states and the conditions under which the uncertainty principle applies. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of mixed states and their statistical properties.

Ssnow
Science Advisor
Messages
573
Reaction score
182
Hi everybody, my question is a curiosity on the (generalized) Heisenberg principle:

## \sigma_{x}\sigma_{p} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2},##

where ##x,p## are the usual quantum operators and ##\hbar## the Planck constant divided by ##2\pi##. If I understood correctly, Gaussian states that are solution of the quantum harmonic oscillator minimize the uncertainty principle with the equality. The question is what happen for the other Gaussian states? It is true for every Gaussian state? For example considering a Gaussian state of the form ## \psi=Ce^{-\lambda x^2}## (with ##C## constant and ##\lambda## a real parameter) it is the inequality true for every ##\lambda##?
Thank you in advance for all answer to by doubt.

Ssnow
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ssnow said:
Hi everybody, my question is a curiosity on the (generalized) Heisenberg principle:

## \sigma_{x}\sigma_{p} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2},##

where ##x,p## are the usual quantum operators and ##\hbar## the Planck constant divided by ##2\pi##. If I understood correctly, Gaussian states that are solution of the quantum harmonic oscillator minimize the uncertainty principle with the equality. The question is what happen for the other Gaussian states? It is true for every Gaussian state? For example considering a Gaussian state of the form ## \psi=Ce^{-\lambda x^2}## (with ##C## constant and ##\lambda## a real parameter) it is the inequality true for every ##\lambda##?
Thank you in advance for all answer to by doubt.

Ssnow

By varying the parameters of the oscillator you can get any positive value for ##\lambda##.

In any case, it's straightforward to show that a Gaussian wave packet also exhibits the minimum uncertainty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
You can use any Gaussian for any system which admits position and momentum observables fulfilling the Heisenberg algebra, ##[\hat{x},\hat{p}] =\mathrm{i} \hbar##.

For the harmonic oscillator they are special, because they are coherent (with ##\Delta x \Delta p =\hbar/2##) or more general squeezed states (with the uncertainty oscillating between finite values).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
Ssnow said:
If I understood correctly, Gaussian states that are solution of the quantum harmonic oscillator minimize the uncertainty principle with the equality. The question is what happen for the other Gaussian states? It is true for every Gaussian state?

For every pure Gaussian state it is true, but for Gaussian states made up of mixtures (not superpositions) of other wavefunctions, the uncertainty principle would not be saturated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
jfizzix said:
Gaussian states made up of mixtures (not superpositions) of other wavefunctions

Can you give an example of such a Gaussian state? (I have no problem with states that are mixtures; I just don't see how the term "Gaussian" can be applied to them.)
 
PeterDonis said:
Can you give an example of such a Gaussian state? (I have no problem with states that are mixtures; I just don't see how the term "Gaussian" can be applied to them.)

For a pure gaussian wavepacket, the density operator looks like:
\rho (x,x') = \langle x|\psi\rangle\langle \psi|x'\rangle = \psi(x)\psi^{*}(x')
The example that comes to my head is the statistics of a correlated double-gaussian wavefunction in x and y, when you trace over y:
\rho (x,x') = \int dy\; \psi(x,y)\psi^{*}(x',y)
Since we contrive it to be correlated, the joint wavefunction doesn't factor, i.e., \psi(x,y)\neq\psi(x)\psi(y)
The marginal position and momentum statistics are gaussian, but do not saturate the Heisenberg limit.

Correlated double-gaussian wavefunctions are commonly used in describing the position-momentum statistics of pairs of entangled particles. See for example: (https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06996)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis
Hm, then you pose the interesting question, whether there are also non-pure states, i.e., proper mixed states with ##\Delta x \Delta p=\hbar/2## or whether there are only the pure states, which are described necessarily by Gaussian wave functions. I've to think about this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
945
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K