From Lights Point of Reference Is It Traveling Infinetly Fast?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lord Draco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lights Point Reference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of light's reference frame and whether it can be considered to travel infinitely fast or instantaneously. Participants explore theoretical implications of observing light from its own perspective, touching on aspects of relativity and energy transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that one cannot transform into the reference frame of light, emphasizing that light always travels at speed c, while everything else appears to approach this speed.
  • Others propose that from the light's perspective, time and space do not exist, rendering the concept of speed meaningless.
  • A participant describes a thought experiment involving a spaceship and a laser, suggesting that the Lorentz transformations lead to infinite energy and time dilation when approaching the speed of light.
  • Another participant notes that if a reference frame were placed on light, it would imply that everything else is moving at the speed of light, which is deemed impossible.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of energy approaching infinity and the paradoxes that arise when trying to conceptualize light's perspective.
  • One participant questions the categorization of the discussion within the quantum mechanics section, suggesting it is more relevant to relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of light's reference frame, with multiple competing views and interpretations remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps in the Lorentz transformations and the dependence on definitions of reference frames. The discussion also highlights the speculative nature of attempting to define a reference frame for light.

Lord Draco
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
From the lights point of reference is it traveling infinitly fast? is it's travel instantaneous?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't transform into the reference frame of light. No matter how close you "think" you're getting light will always be c. However, you will see everything else you used to see as stationary moving closer to the speed of light as well. The energy of all that will go to infinity, but the energy of the photon you are trying to catch will go to zero.
 
From the light's point of view there is no time and there is no space - hence speed is meaningless.
 
Longstreet said:
You can't transform into the reference frame of light. No matter how close you "think" you're getting light will always be c. However, you will see everything else you used to see as stationary moving closer to the speed of light as well. The energy of all that will go to infinity, but the energy of the photon you are trying to catch will go to zero.
I know, i know, any object with mass can not travel at the speed of light, it was meant to be a thought experiment, but what do you mean "The energy of all that will go to infinity" i just can't seem to get my head around it.
 
Lord Draco said:
I know, i know, any object with mass can not travel at the speed of light, it was meant to be a thought experiment, but what do you mean "The energy of all that will go to infinity" i just can't seem to get my head around it.
Say you have a spaceship that is your laboratory, that has a laser pointed in some direction. Your question is basically, what does the spaceship look like from the point of view of the photons in the laser? Well, you can say they are simply going at the speed of light, so I'll plug that into the lorez transformations. This gives infinite energy, infinite time dilation, infinite length contraction, etc for the the spaceship.
But there is still something funky if you do this.
The lorenz transform for velocity is:

[tex] {v^`}_x = \frac{v_x - u}{1 - {v_x u}/c^2}[/tex]

Setting [tex]v_x = c[/tex], the speed of the photons, we can take the limit of [tex]u\rightarrowc[/tex] for our fictional observer.

[tex] \lim_{\substack{u\rightarrow c}} \frac{c - u}{1 - u/c} = c[/tex]
(note: since pluging c directly in gives 0/0, you have to use L'Hospital's rule, taking the derivative of the top and bottom, giving you c.)

So you can never catch the photons. This is interesting right, since our observer is going exactly at c relative to the spaceship.
 
Last edited:
the reason you can't put a reference frame on light is because if you did, everything would be going at the speed of light relative to this reference frame. This is impossible. However, as a reference frame (S') approaches the speed of light relative to reference frame S, everything at rest relative to S appears to slow down to t' = infinity * t, and contract in length to l' = 0 * l. However, were S' to slow down to the be at rest with S, it would find that as that maximum speed approaches the speed of light, the time that has passed in S has approached infinity. So in a way, a photons reference frame is instantaneous.
 
Last edited:
and why is this in the quantum mechanics section? this is a relativity question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K